Presumably one of the issues being discussed here, such as mitigating the effects of Russia's wildly successful manipulation campaigns that have resulted in both US policy and cultural shifts in favor of Russian interests. To skip some steps in this comment chain, and at risk of being presumptuous, pick an option from this technically-exhaustive list:

Do you believe that:

1. Russia has not engaged in misinformation-based influence campaigns targeting US citizens

2. Russia has engaged in such campaigns but to no tangible effect, and they therefore require no response

3. Russia's influence campaigns saw success, but not to the detriment of the US, and they therefore require no response

4. Russia's success harms US interests, but it would be hypocritical to actively respond given the US' past actions

5. Russia's success is tethered to cultural shifts, which are impermanent and therefore don't necessitate an active response

6. Russia's success can only be effectively countered by the gov't, so civilian attempts at helping are futile

7. None of the items above relate to the topic of discussion in this thread, i.e. this comment effectively strawman-ing

8. The above points are non-exhaustive

I'm quite sure an intelligent person with an open mind can be convinced that each of the above points is false, save the last one.