Hacker News Reader

Comment by redmajor12 | Hacker News Reader

Supporting peace?! That's a right wing cause now?

I wish I knew how to respond to such ridiculously bad faith comments like this.

Ukraine has no leverage to bring to any peace negotiations. The only possible way to get peace is for Ukraine to roll over and get annexed by Russia.

You're arguing for the Bad Guys to win.

Good thing the world isn’t a marvel movie

Why do some many people think enabling invaders is "supporting peace"? Chamberlainism used be so verboten.

Because Russian shills, the Alt-Right have already burrowed deep into HN. Don't assume much of the discussion here is anything but in bad faith that feigns ignorance to exhaust opposing arguments. It's the classic gish-gallop in play.

Would you please stop breaking the site guidelines like this? I asked you once already: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43213985.

This is a divisive topic with a range of opinion. I don't see any evidence of shills so far but if you think you do, you should be emailing us at hn@ycombinator.com so we can look into it, not posting this sort of sinister speculation to the threads. It's the ultimate internet cliché, and has a degrading effect on discussion. Hence that guideline.

Supporting peace via the 2025 version of the Molotov–Ribbentrop pact? It is very important for future world peace that Russia not be successful in this war.

You don't even have to go back to WWII, we let Russia take part of Ukraine in 2014 and look how that worked out. The idea that letting other countries annex parts of their neighbors is a recipe for lasting peace would be laughable if I didn't see it so often. It's like Charlie Brown and the football every time: https://imgflip.com/i/9lvwwu

And before that, there was Georgia in 2008.

Their Peace is Ukraine laying back and taking it.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com