I’d be more on with this if I trusted someone to take a wide view on these issues, as it stands I’ve observed that personal liberty is heavily biased by some towards personal liberty for the upper classes; but I hope to be wrong.
All of this is seems admirable, but it reveals the supreme naïvety of an intellect that can advocate for “personal liberty” and “free markets” yet not realize that each can impede the other in certain ways, and so it is necessary to study and debate the dynamics and structure of this interaction.
I wonder how much will they publish about amazon hurting free markets or government curbing personal liberties of non straight people.