This is really confusing to me. The original discussion was about changing licenses, but somehow (coincidentally?) there was malicious code discovered shortly after? Are these related?
- build an open-source thing
- wait till thousands or millions of people are using it
- change the license and close down the source
- implement malicious code
- push an update
- profit! you now have your malware running on millions of systems
but no need to single them out.
Plenty of bait and switch later free apps turned freemium, or malicious, out there.
Society as a whole could easily avoid this by funding open source/free utilities to the point where malware makers need to spend significant cash to outbid yearly community support, but unfortunately maintaining anything available online for free is a thankless job that barely covers the electricity required to maintain the code.
In this case too, the developers behind the theme seemed to want to monetise their work, which had attained almost 4 million installs, in the past, but found themselves with a rather unwilling customer base. I don't know if they snapped and uploaded something malicious or if they're intentionally making it hard for forks to copy their work, but either way the lesson learned is that if you want to make money you should just abandon your free projects and start something else.
As long as we won't have to pay 2 USD for an extension!
GGs if you want a buck for the VSCode theme you made.
I know I'm in the minority, but I block ads because of memetic hygiene. I don't want to deprive artists but I'm not sitting through adslop for a podcaster's sake.
Disclosure: I work at Google.
Soon, I'm going to need an extension that removes the AI stuff I don't want and didn't ask for.
Using youtube in 2025 is exhausting.
Skipping sponsored sections: https://sponsor.ajay.app/
Remove shorts: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/remove-youtub...
Return dislike: https://www.returnyoutubedislike.com/
Forgot to mention returning the dislike in my original comment.
At least I can use these extensions and get something resembling the service I want to pay for.
Also note that while it takes away the ads, it does nothing about the stalking (which bothers me much more than the adverts themselves) the results from which will be used to serve ads if you cancel in future (and in any case may be made available, directly or otherwise, to third parties, unless that part of the terms has changed).
Netflix 1080p: $18/mo. Netflix 4k: $25/mo. No annual plan.
Youtube Premium, which offers 4k, is $14/mo, or $120/yr for the annual plan (which averages to $12/mo).
UK prices:
Netflix 1080p: £13/mo. Netflix 4k: £19/mo. No annual plan.
Youtube Premium: £12/mo. No annual plan.
It's interesting how in the Youtube Premiums discount over Netflix is smaller in the UK than the US, and how Youtube Premium lacks an annual plan in the UK.
>Also note that while it takes away the ads, it does nothing about the stalking
Does an ad blocker change that?
> Does an ad blocker change that?
In many places, yes. Youtube? Less so, but it depends on which blocker(s) are in play.
A DNS based blocker won't help completely as some of the ad/track related requests are coming from their main domain or sub-domains that are used for other things so can't be blocked wholescale. It will block JS and other resources pulling from *.doubleclick.net though.
A browser/add-on based blocker may do much better by being able to more selectively block resource that are tracking related. It will also be able to block data passed via embedded videos in other sites. They can, and probably do, still track based on what you are actually watching via requests to the main domain, no ad blocker can do much about that without blocking the whole site.
>The Privacy Enhanced Mode of the YouTube embedded player prevents the use of views of embedded YouTube content from influencing the viewer’s browsing experience on YouTube. This means that the view of a video shown in the Privacy Enhanced Mode of the embedded player will not be used to personalize the YouTube browsing experience, either within your Privacy Enhanced Mode embedded player or in the viewer’s subsequent YouTube viewing experience.
>If ads are served on a video shown in the Privacy Enhanced Mode of the embedded player, those ads will likewise be non-personalized. In addition, the view of a video shown in the Privacy Enhanced Mode of the embedded player will not be used to personalize advertising shown to the viewer outside of your site or app.
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/171780?hl=en#zippy...