> the incorrect belief that there's some emergency button you can press to demand that a court consider your arguments ASAP
... isn't that exactly the legal button the complainant pushed to prevent the revocation?
... isn't that exactly the legal button the complainant pushed to prevent the revocation?
Temporary restraining orders are the biggest exception. If DigiCert is about to do something crazy like take down all your websites, courts are generally willing to put a temporary stop to it without understanding all the details. "Preserve the status quo" and "prevent irreparable harm" are the buzzwords.
So if DigiCert's irreparable harm was great would that prevent it? Like legally requiring CAs to follow their revocation policies or pay millions in damages?