For the most part, debating different opinions in this community still feels productive and I have not seen too many times where it’s completely devolved to indecency
I say that as a moderate/liberal Texan which tends to put me in the ultra far right compared to some of the more Bay Area/California liberal centric ideologies that I’ve seen dominate here
I guess if GP had said "I've been flagging most posts I see related to politics" that would be fine.
- "Funding for NASA's next science mission in question"
- "A deep dive into the IRS's legacy computer systems"
- "State governors band together to propose new cyber-security rules"
- "UK government again takes aim at encryption"
- "List of IT systems DOGE staff members have access to"
Are all of these things just not-discussable here anymore, merely because they brush up against a government or politics?
>unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon.
and
>If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably off-topic
Going off these, I would say "A deep dive into the IRS's legacy computer systems" is clearly fine, and the others could be considered questionable to varying degrees. I think it's fair to say that a news update should not automatically be considered an interesting new phenomenon because almost by definition all TV news will have some new element to it, and that is expressly labeled as "probably off-topic."
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&so...