How can you have a functional democracy where the person who was elected to lead the executive branch and who also campaigned on increasing efficiency is not allowed to do that? Especially after the judicial branch has OKed it.
And by "the judicial branch has OK'd it", are you referring to the President's immunity from prosecution for official acts?
That is fundamentally different than "presidents have the power to do whatever they want".
https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/federal-judge-wont-stop-tru...
- This ruling doesn't say the government isn't breaking the law, it says the people suing didn't go through the right channels.
- This ruling is not the government winning the case, or the plaintiffs losing the case. Plaintiffs asked for a restraining order and didn't get one.
- There are about 80 different lawsuits against Elon/DOGE right now, for various actions. Multiple judges have granted restraining orders against the government because they think the plaintiffs are likely to prevail in their claim.
And the judicial branch hasn't okayed what he has tried to do, which is why there have been multiple orders issued by multiple courts against his stopping of payments.
I keep hearing all these things about how the voters voted for this and that but uh when did the candidate promise those items?
This is not true as evidenced by your own link below.
He is firmly pro corruption
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-fcpa-anti-bribery-law-exe...