Hacker News Reader

If things felt corrupt before, why not improve the processes? Why keep doing the same but with the companies the administration in turn likes the best?

View on HN

Removing the process is the improvement. This is what we voted for. Less processes not more and actual results.

Ask ChatGPT to compare and contrast Kamala Harris's effectiveness as "broadband Tzar" as compared to SpaceX Starlink.

Less process creates transparency gaps which become opportunities for more corruption.

There is a balance in process vs. efficiency.

The idea that anyone removing any processes is only doing it to insert corruption isn't a valid argument against efficiency

Got it, so frame the question using language hinting i'm looking for an anti Harris response.

What do you think is the best way for a voter to decide if Harris would be a good steward of tax payer money?

Bleep bloop bleep bloop, looks like AI generated responses even reached Hacker News.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com