We know the limitations of current LLM AI. I didn't read the article. Is there anything in these "dangers" that isn't currently known, mainly hallucination related?
All these anti LLM articles are starting to become as tiresome as the pro LLM ones.
All these anti LLM articles are starting to become as tiresome as the pro LLM ones.
Otherwise the journalism, in general, is not in such a great shape if it can only regurgitate the same thing over and over, the same words from the same mouths.
Just an idea. I donno.