But Musk sells rockets, so it's not waste. QED.
But Musk sells rockets, so it's not waste. QED.
Ok, you're obviously trolling here. This is clearly bait. But for anyone else reading this:
NASA's budget for 2023 was roughly $25 billion [0]
For the same year, NASA generated (again, roughly) $76 billion in economic output [1].
Every dollar of funding goes back into the economy three-fold. Doesn't really seem like a waste to me.
Also, NASA's operations in 2023 created/supported over 300,000 jobs to Americans[2]. Again, doesn't seem like a waste to me.
[0] - https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/fiscal-year-...
[1] - https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/final-fy23-n...
[2] - https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/nasa-fy23-ec...
Only a little. The point is "waste" and "efficiency" are so subjective to be a near meaningless concepts. You could make the same points you did about many of the things Musk wants to cut, but they're not going to resonate to a tech audience like cutting NASA does. It's basically a temple of geek religion.
> NASA's budget for 2023 was roughly $25 billion [0]
That money could fund a lot of housing assistance or healthcare.
Personally, I think the things that "engineers" like should be cut first instead of being protected.
NASA is not useless. Just look up how many innovations literally came from the ISS. And that is just one part of it.