If the writing is on the wall shouldn't we be seeing a massive boost in open source contributions? Shouldn't we be seeing a spike in new kernels, operating systems, network stacks, database, programming languages, frameworks, libraries...?
There are opposing theories that with AI we will see less open source contributions, new tech (outside AI), libraries, etc. There is also less incentive to post code up these days as in the age of AI many no longer want to make their code public.
Anecdotally in my tech circles the enthusiasm for things like languages, libraries, DST, open source and general CS is declining rapidly - it all feels "pre-AI" era now. In the end everyone has their focus on the threat that is AI, almost frozen in fear. This is especially true since outside of the US, things like AI opportunities are quite limited (i.e. in the new era the tech opportunities aren't as distributed). Things that make programming "human" in general, again at least anecdotally, seems very 2010's and older now. When people are "in fear/threat mode" their willingness to invest, even if they enjoy it, is lower. Why prove I can do OS contributions, maybe that's time better spent re-skilling to be a plumber? I've heard that one recently. In the end more than enjoyment people need to eat and there is a cost to investing time in something.
If AI can do it better in a year or two why waste my time now - just wait and do nothing and I will have it anyway later. That includes potentially OS contributions.
The subset of people who might do that and are paying sufficient attention to this are still reeling, and are mostly otherwise occupied.
2. A lily pad is growing in a pond and it doubles in size every day. After 30 days it covers the entire pond. On what day does it cover half the pond? https://i.imgur.com/grNJAZO.jpeg
Of course "o3 hasn't even really been released yet" only strengthens the point.
What are they doing?