Touch-sensitive inputs, like those on the google pixel buds pro 2, are even worse. Any touch can have weird results as it might be detected as a swipe or a long-touch.
Kudos to the Jabra earbuds I was gifted recently, they can remap the single/double/triple clicks, so a single click for me is now next track.
And as I age, I get dry skin which sometimes doesn't even register as a touch.
I'd love to see a range of accessible hardware that has actual buttons that clearly state what they do, and have visual+haptic+audio feedback which can be configured.
I disagree with this as a blanket statement. This often comes up in the context of cars, which, sure, I agree. It's imperative to have physical feedback and have the controls in a familiar place.
I also think device makers are investing less in interface design. Just like you have have an intuitive interface with physical buttons or not, you can also have an intuitive interface with a touch screen.
In this context, where the stakes are lower than driving a car and you don't need to identify each control by touch to use the thing safely, if you can get more screen real estate by eschewing some physical controls for touch screen controls, I think that would make the device more usable as a TV viewing device.
(Or at least I haven't seen that yet)
In a sense I guess it could be done, but I'm then struggling to find a way I could trust the switch to be removed correctly..
Is this just the analogue digital debate?