Who said a COBOL system is prone to fraud?
Incomplete and inaccurate data is prone to fraud. Talking about COBOL is missing the point.
Incomplete and inaccurate data is prone to fraud. Talking about COBOL is missing the point.
It doesn't mean the data is missing or inaccurate, any more than a null reference in Java means your program is going to segfault. It simply indicates that the data is not present in this scope.
If Musk was posting: "Guys I just discovered they have tons of null checks in their code here, that's obviously an indication of fraud!" — would that make any sense to you?