Nostalgia for Physical Media
sicpers.info
sicpers.info
This would remain true if they sounded just like CDs but otherwise worked like vinyl.
When I was a teenager, I would occasionally buy a CD and put it in my car. A lot of the time, that was basically the only music I listened to for a month, maybe more, so I would become pretty intimately familiar with the album, and it would play continuously as I was driving. I would listen to all the songs on the album over and over again, and a lot of the time songs that I initially didn't like all that much actually became my favorites.
With the advent of Spotify and its brethren, it's much easier to only listen to songs that you instantly liked, because pretty much every song ever made is directly available to you.
Obviously, you can just play the whole album on Spotify, and maybe if you're self-disciplined enough then you could force yourself to listen to an album over and over again on there, but I have always found that pretty difficult, and my streaming ends up being kind of an echo chamber of stuff I already know I like.
To be clear, I do think that the streaming services are, generally speaking, much better than what we had in the 90's and early 2000's, but there are aspects that I miss.
We're back to a world of disconnected songs, in some ways. It's not uncommon for an artist to release a bunch of singles then just, later, collect those into a nominal "album" for physical sales, like the earliest days of LPs. Some artists seem to only release singles for streaming (I see this a lot in off-mainstream hiphop). I think only the idea and marketing power of the thematic album-tour is really keeping the form of the album alive as a shaping force for music.
As my parents have often informed me, an album on which you liked two of the songs was a good one, and one on which you liked three was a great one. Mostly you bought an album for a single track that was on there. But, publishers would frequently release "greatest hits" albums consolidating many popular songs onto the same album.
This seems to be basically identical to the system you describe that we have now, except that in the "single track" phase of the process, the track costs $1 instead of $15.
I think the reason that Dark Side of the Moon, for example, is so loved is in no small part because it is was well tailored to be an album. The songs blend in to each other, there are repeated motifs throughout the album, it comes together as one big cohesive unit, and as such I can't really listen to "one song" on it, I usually have to put on the whole album (or at least side 2).
If you were/are careful in your purchases, you could/can find plenty of albums that are wall-to-wall magic. Some that I enjoyed in my youth:
- Beatles, Revolver - Beastie Boys, Ill Communication - Led Zeppelin IV - Led Zeppelin, Houses of the Holy - Metallica, self-titled ("Black Album") - Nirvana, Nevermind - Pearl Jam, Ten - Pink Floyd, Dark Side of the Moon - Radiohead, OK Computer - Snoop Dogg, Doggystyle - Weezer, self-titled ("Blue Album")
Or thirds! See: Monty Python's three-sided record.
Then there's e.g. classical music, where it wasn't unusual for one purchased unit of music to be a small box of several LPs. The album-as-an-artform, where "album" is usually one or two records created as a semi- or entirely-cohesive piece that was nonetheless broken into a bunch of shorter tracks and all crafted for the form and experience of the LP, was mostly a phenomenon for popular forms of music. IDK if "classical" music that was actually composed during the height of the LP was meaningfully and in some widespread way shaped by the LP record like pop music was, or not (I just don't know much about that music).
[EDIT] To be clear, what I'm talking about as far as the medium affecting the form the art took and how it was experienced isn't just things like full-on "concept albums", but attention to things like consistent tone or flow or placement of songs at the start of sides, or attention to which song ends a side and how that acts to draw one to the next side, or to close the current one, or whatever.
That’s also an element of why this is popular
Add all those together and they become, well, popular
The "thingness" of older hardware had a pleasure all its own.
Also, you owned it.
EDIT: I tapped into this nostalgia in a way when I released htmx 2.0 on 5.25 & 3.5 floppy disks for the first week: https://swag.htmx.org/products/floppy
Don't worry: we could still make a physical cartridge with DRM that would stop working after you unsubscribe from the service :-)
If I didn’t know better, I’d think the manufacturers were actively trying to sabotage physical media. That the default UX should be “insert disc, wait three seconds, hit play” is not exactly rocket science.
https://i0.wp.com/www.aventure-apple.com/blog/wp-content/upl...
It's not a perfect solution, but in most cases, the raw data on the CD stays intact in one way or another.
That assumes you're using a storage platform that routinely validates the integrity of the data at rest.
I'm pretty sure there used to be a word for that, back in the before days.
A few years, lots of eBay auctions, and many bluray and DVD rips later, I've got my own expansive library that's just as convenient to watch but the no missed earnings targets can take away from me.
Next on my list is music. I've built a respectable digital library but I'd like to have that backed by CD's where possible. Vinyl is nice for my absolute favourite albums but it's not an everyday kind of listening experience IMO - bit hard to listen to my records while I'm going for a walk!
For anyone getting into physical media I would highly suggest;
- Buying secondhand. In a lot of cases this is the only option anyway, but you can get bulk lots of CD's, DVD's, and Blurays for about the same price as a month of Netflix or Spotify.
- Backing up your physical copies. An old PC with the appropriate DVD/Bluray drive is very cheap, easy to automate, and you get to have the best of both worlds.
One big caveat is that "older" formats like cassette, VHS, and vinyl are not as simple or cheap. But it's not impossible to obtain and back them up, it just takes a little more time and equipment.
For example, CDs are listed preferable to vinyl because the sound quality is better. That's not my understanding of how nostalgia works. People who grew up with vinyl records may be nostalgic for them not because they're a superior format, but because they evoke a memory of former times.
For myself, personally, I'm only slightly nostalgic for vinyl (we didn't have a record player in my house, but my babysitter did), but I have a ton of nostalgia for his lowest-ranked format, 8-tracks. That's what my dad had in his 60s-era Chevy pickup with an aftermarket 8-track player. I think of riding next to him on the bench seat and pulling out a tape from the black leather case that fit under it, containing a total of, I think, 6 options. We could both sing every song on them, and would do that in the parking lot when we waited for my mom to get off work. It was a terrible format, but the nostalgia factor is through the roof.
CDs, I can take or leave, I guess. For me, the CD was a thing I could burn MP3s onto and play through my CD player, attached via cassette interface to my 1987 Beretta.
Even my streamlined slimed-down minimalistic MacBook Pro has an SD-Card slot.
We can make SD-Cards with music and movies on them a reality, we just have to walk to our nearest convenience store, grab a 64Gb version for 10 bucks, put stuff on it, and give it to a friend.
My kids have these music players called Yoto players. They're extreme DRM, but still fun and really accessible for little kids to use. Content "comes" on these NFC cards about the size of a playing card. You stick the card in a slot on the top of the player, it plays the music cached from "the cloud". It would have been neat to have something about as durable as this but not an entirely closed single-vendor system.