I'm sure you could technically emulate all this in C++ is you keep throwing template metaprogramming at it, but at that point anything is a C++ subset and the statement loses all pratical meaning.
I'm sure you could technically emulate all this in C++ is you keep throwing template metaprogramming at it, but at that point anything is a C++ subset and the statement loses all pratical meaning.
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2024/p26...
That is the thing with committee driven languages, with multiple vendor implementations.
Not everyone is on the same room voting for the same features, and not everyone is implementing the features in any specific order.
By the way, I would rather have Safe C++ than profiles, but do not vote, so whatever.
It has hardly moved since 1989, and annex K doesn't count, given its broken design.
Anyway I am still mostly stuck with .NET Framework, Java 17, node 20 in many commercial deployments, so it isn't like everyone cares that much to update to latest, given existing business decisions.
Those kind of industries don't care about programming language featurities anyway.
pattern matching had a poll in forwarding to the CWG, and it was mostly in favor, though enough were against it to not reach consensus
profiles had a poll in forwarding to the CWG, and it was split down the line in terms of for/against.
Given the previous votes on profiles being nearly unanimously for, I'm interested to see what people have to say about what went on.