I find it fascinating how robust ideologies are. They have to contain countless responses to thousands of ways of questioning their coherence.

In this example, to the concern about a power imbalance there was an immediate, trained response of „it can’t be done” - there’s simply no way to diminish the concentration of wealth.

It’s fantastic because you acknowledge that the imbalance is there and that it’s problematic - that can’t be argued. So instead you argue that it’s inevitable.

Intricate web of beliefs. Stable and resilient to any challenge.