on one hand i can see how it's going to break stuff (and I see they've changed it! []). on the other hand... mind talking a bit more about how it did break things?
[]: https://github.com/boostorg/container_hash/commit/40ec854466...
[]: https://github.com/boostorg/container_hash/commit/40ec854466...
I wasn't aware boost had changed it, but the solution I settled on was essentially identical to what boost came to here. There's some further issues with that system in that the mixing functions aren't ideal for all bitlengths T. The way they're using it here is safe, but it annoyed me enough to devise a class of mixing functions with provably max length periods for all sizes T (at the cost of some mixing quality). Haven't published that crate yet because I'm not sure who else would want it.