Reddit plans to lock some content behind a paywall this year, CEO says
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
I do visit it and use it, but being a mod for an year and seeing the sub I was in attacked by rival subs and their community (including mods) and eventually banned by reddit admins was just mind boggling to me.
Never have I seen such unfairness and at the end of the day, Reddit admins don't care. If you mod a small sub (10k or so), you're irrelevant. I guess because of ads revenue and clicks they favor big subs even thou their community and mods can be openly aggressive.
Reddit can go to hell.
edit: sorry for the rant, I guess I needed to vent.
they banned me because they said by calling it that instead of it's proper name American Shepherd, I supported backyard breeders.
I couldn't believe it.
I've been going there since it started in the 2000s?
I basically only go to X/twitter now because Facebook and Instagram and tiktok are just pure slop.
Hate to be the one breaking this to you but Xitter is filled to the brim with slop.
Try open source alternatives.
I also have a local chrome extension I made that automatically removes political tweets from my timeline, that + following people who talk about very specific things is enough to make my experience there largely positive.
What I did was simple, removed all my comments, removed all my submissions, deleted my account and haven't been back there nor do I plan to.
Some people can be sick in their mind.
https://www.reddit.com/r/slatestarcodex/comments/9rvroo/most...
> Edit: I guess my tone-projection is off. A lot of people seem to be put-off by my usage of the word "insane." I intended that as tongue-in-cheek and did not mean to imply that any of them literally have diagnosable mental illnesses. I have a lot of respect for all of the individuals I listed and they seem like nice people, I was just trying to make a point about how unusual their behavior is.
Welcome to the club I guess.
Because subs I like now ... nobody is interested in talking to a small subset of the sub.
And content is so variable that I don't see a reason to pay money to see better cat memes. I just find a new free sub if needed.
But hopefully some of them will find their way to Lemmynsfw.
Ps for what it's worth I used to actually subscribe to Reddit. When it was called Reddit gold. But at some point they more than doubled the price and gave you crap tokens to give away to other people. I didn't want to do that and didn't want to pay so much so I quit. I think they can get a lot more subscribers if they just lowered the price somewhat.
There is a comment here that I regularly look back at as it remains evergreen:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31363953
> My take is, if a community is constrained by quality (eg moderation, self-selecting invite-only etc) then the only way it grows is by lowering the threshold. Inevitably that means lower quality content.
> To some extent, more people can make up for it. Eg if I go from 10 excellent artists to 1000 good ones, chances are that the top 10% artwork created actually gets better.
> But eventually if you grow by lowering quality, then, well, quality drops.
> I suppose for very small societies, they may be limited by discoverability/cliquiness and not quality, so their growth doesn’t mesh with quality and so they could also get better with size.
> Note, “quality” doesn’t have to mean good/bad but also just “property”. When Facebook started, it was for kids from elite schools. It then gradually diluted that by lowering that particular bar. Then it was for kids from all schools. Then young people. Then their parents too. Clearly, it’s far from dying in absolute terms, but it’s certainly no longer what it initially was. To many initial users, it’s as good as dead though.
But yeah it was a better time.
Maybe too many people have already discovered it.
Maybe they are blocking crawlers or something.
My subs are spammed by onlyfans type content ... a lot.
And frankly at this point I think Reddit would be happy to be in some kind of business that makes money, any kind of business.
"The vast majority of our content is suitable for all ages, but out of concern for the minority that isn't and the evolving legal landscape, we felt that the best thing to do was silo our 18+ content. After looking at ways to implement this, while still respecting user privacy, our team came to the conclusion that a paywall is by far the most reliable method."
Sure it's bs, but that's standard for this world.
https://old.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1ipe74t/reddit_...
https://old.reddit.com/r/nottheonion/comments/1ipfctm/reddit...
<creepy autocorrect begins typing at the speed of a 300bps modem...>
If Reddit offered community management, payment processing, and content hosting, and undercut Patreon's 8% fee, I think it's a real winner.
The benefit to Reddit is that they get a user in their ecosystem, looking at ads, subscribing to more subreddits, etc.
They already paywall people behind a VPN, so don't care.
If you like Reddit but you complain about their decisions, I would recommend to use Lemmy instead.
Reddit is already unrecognizable to me compared to long ago, when the narwhal still bacon'd at midnight.
I mean I still use "Old Reddit" for the UI, but the content and commenters are entirely the opposite of what Reddit once was.
It's like in Mad Max when the kids pass on an oral history of the "before times" of Captain Walker, in broad strokes that are largely made-up. Their reality is a fabrication, and it's impossible for anybody to tell them so.
And they like their reality and heck maybe they'll pay to keep liking it.