This is very disingenuous, and you seem to think you can bullshit people.
(Don't know where the "age"ist is doing there?)
This is very disingenuous, and you seem to think you can bullshit people.
(Don't know where the "age"ist is doing there?)
To answer your second question, I don't think any male athlete should compete in women's sports, since it negates the purpose of having sex-segregated categories. I believe it's possible to preserve these categories without excluding or vilifying transgender athletes. And I think this sentiment is in line with the vast majority of people who understand there is a tension between affirming people's gender identity and being fair to female athletes.
("Ageist" is a joke about the non-sequitur accusations of transphobia I got in response to my tweet.)
See this thread for further detail: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43025035
were "male" is redefined as "the 46,XY karyotype".
What's next, are we going to screen all basketball players for genes that makes one too tall?
But congratulations on Algeria, apparently a "woke" country were it is easy for men to pass as women for decades.
https://www.alamy.com/silver-medalist-francine-niyonsaba-of-...
Also, we know that these three were deemed ineligible for future events under the revised World Athletics DSD policy which was developed with the intent of excluding male physical advantage from women's competitions.
Semenya's DSD (5-alpha reductase deficiency) is public knowledge due to the Court of Arbitration for Sport publishing a ruling revealing this. This is a DSD that only affects male sexual development, not female.