> It was profitable to do so a year ago, it was simply dangerous politically.
Explain? Because if it was politically dangerous, it automatically means it wasn’t profitable.
Explain? Because if it was politically dangerous, it automatically means it wasn’t profitable.
Advertising was dangerous because there was a perception that the previous US government would politically prosecute anyone who opposed them. Companies advertising on X, and hence supporting opposition such as Musk, would fall into this category.