RFK Jr Will Be Confirmed as Secretary of Health and Human Services
reuters.com
reuters.com
I don't write this flippantly. You may have some excellent points, but in this environment, I would love to read more than just a broad statement. This website is one of the last places where we might expect such a thing.
The supporting evidence is the economy and world state of affairs.
Turns out printing a fuck ton of money, handicapping energy and massive amounts of fraud lead to inflation, who woulda guessed.
Not to mention the millions dead while Biden sit back and watched conflicts. All of which can now have peace talks.
Then there's the disastrous Afghanistan withdraw.
Want anything else?
Yes. The Truth.
Economy: US economy out-performed the Europe, Japan, India, ... during Biden's tenure. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?end=2023...
Energy: Production is at historic highs and the US is a net energy exporter. https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/us-energy-facts/
World Affairs - I suppose you could concede portions of the Ukraine to Russia. Those aren't my politics. Maybe you believe in conquest by violence, though.
Afghanistan withdrawal was Trump's plan. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-51692546. I credit Trump with ending this conflicting. It should have been ended a long time before that. But he signed a weak deal in February of 2020 that left a lot political pain for his successor.
Yes and Trump safely reduced troops down to 6000 out with no deaths for years.
But then, Biden pulled out of Bagram Airfield Base, leaving billions in weapons for the terrorists.
Then had Al Qaeda run security for the local airfield, so naturally there was a bombing that killed 300 people including 13 marines.
Not to mention the people falling of the airplanes because it was so chaotic and uncontrolled.
It's good to pull out of Afghanistan, Trump was right to do so. But Biden fucked it all up.
You don’t withdraw the bulk of an army, leave a token force in place, and expect that to go well. You just don’t do that, and Trump the very stable genius he is, did. And it worked out well politically for him, so I guess it was smart.
I was off on the numbers though.
So Trump reduced it from 4,500 to 2,500 mid Jan 2021.
Point is, terrible execution on the pull out.
Leave from the base, take the equipment.
Don't trust terrorists to run security.
300 people died because Biden is an idiot.
It's not that he was pulling them out. It's HOW he pulled them out.
If it were a Republican you would have criticized that shit show too.
The final 2500 were pulled out of Bagram by Biden.
THEN the evacuation was done by 500 troops at the local airfield by flying in.
If you knew it would collapse, why not fly everyone out when the 2500 troops were there and the airbase was still functional.
They even acted like they trusted the Afghan government for the 1 week it was still there.
It's not about losing or winning. Biden got 300 people killed.
> The agreement stipulated fighting restrictions for both the US and the Taliban, and provided for the withdrawal of all NATO forces from Afghanistan in return for the Taliban's counter-terrorism commitments. The US agreed to an initial reduction of its force level from 13,000 to 8,600 within 135 days (i.e. by July 2020), followed by a full withdrawal within 14 months (i.e. by 1 May 2021) if the Taliban kept its commitments. The United States also committed to closing five military bases within 135 days, and expressed its intent to end economic sanctions on the Taliban by August 27, 2020. The agreement was welcomed by Pakistan, China, Russia and India,[4][7][8] and unanimously endorsed by the UN Security Council.[9]
> Insurgent attacks against the Afghan security forces, however, surged in the aftermath of the deal, with thousands killed. However, withdrawals per the agreement continued. By January 2021, just 2,500 US troops remained in the country, and NATO forces fully evacuated by the end of that summer. The US completed its full evacuation on August 30, 2021, as the Taliban took control of the country by force.
> Critics of the deal claimed that the then Trump administration appeased the Taliban and ignored the then Afghan government for a quick withdrawal from Afghanistan.[10]
How is how Biden executed the final withdraw Trump's fault?
- the disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan. Biden pulled out troops before getting out civilians, green card holders and allies. Not everyone was evacuated and billions of dollars worth of equipment was left behind for the Taliban to take over
- the way the Biden regime botched the burgeoning Abraham accords by turning their backs to the Saudis while opening up to the Iranians - why? All this achieved was the intensification of smouldering conflicts which begot the world the rise of the Houthi's, the 6th of Octoboer incursion by Hamas and the resulting carnage and more
- the way the Biden regime botched the situation around Ukraine with him hinting at a 'minor incursion' not being taken seriously. With the disastrous Afghanistan withdrawal and this weak-kneed response from the USA Putin deemed the time ripe for invasion
On the domestic side I can mention the 'border crisis' caused by the intentional import of millions of illegal immigrants, the failed energy policies, the mis-named 'inflation reduction act' and similar financial boondoggles which caused rampant inflation, the weaponisation of the justice department and the FBI which has led to trust in the judiciary sinking to a record low level, the similar weaponisation of the IRS, the authoritarian push around the SARS2 unpleasantness with the whole web of lies around both the origin of the antigen as well as the efficacy of the only allowed treatment regimes, the mishandling of the military which has seen record low recruitment levels since the regime has tried to push the military towards 'progressive' political goals, the endless parade of lies around just about any subject which cropped up from the 'laptop from hell' through the 'summer of love', the clear examples of corruption where Biden pardoned his family for their influence peddling, etcetera. There is far more to mention but this is enough for starters.
If you want evidence I'd invite you to do a cursory search on the 'net, you'll find tons of it. Be aware of the political bias of whatever source you refer to but even the most biased sources will be unable to hide the last regime's failures since they are so blatant and visible.
I looked up some of your accusations, and there is no evidence. If you disagree, please provide links.
I used to think that "may you live in interesting times" was a blessing. I no longer believe that. It is clearly a curse.
At this moment in time, it appears that we are cooked as a species.
You didn't address any of his points, at all.
No one is against improving the USofA diet, it's globally infamous for sugary toxicity.
RFK Jr's idea of a good diet, however, includes parasite ridden roadkill. Then there's all his other weird little fringe beliefs.
Edit: All the criticisms I can find online seem to point towards creating a top caloric standard with no change as kids age (and that seems to be pretty valid criticism to me). Also that she established low fat options which increased sugar intake (perhaps wasn’t as dubious then, but definitely seems to be more valid criticism now)
I could not be more embarrassed for humanity, and my country.
If anyone would like an escape, please watch the amazing, and incredibly ignored show Pantheon.[0] The main topic covered is uploaded human intelligence. The script tech advisors, animation, and voice actors are excellent. Check it out. Much better than dealing with this folly.
You can not be pro DEI and still find competent people. Just by the numbers, it’s possible.
To be “most unqualified” you can select from DEI or not, as any group will have horribly qualified people.
There are many in the medical field that aren’t DEI that care deeply about, and are knowledgeable about the major health issues in this country - vaccines, obesity, malnutrition, mental health, fertility, cancer, food supply (and its poor quality), environmental, activity, elder care, dementia, early childhood health care, just to name a few.
I am unaware of his qualifications to lead such an org, but at that level, he’s mostly a political talking head anyway. Still, I agree it’s quite bad. We’ll know in a few years the outcome.
All that said, “could not be more embarrassed for humanity and my country” - really? You think this is worse than the Great Depression when security forces were paid to guard piles of rotting fruit so the starving couldn’t eat them? The rise of the KKK? The horrors of the civil war?
Inflationary language might feel good, but its effect is it encourages the forgetting of worse things, increases internal conflict, and makes reconciliation and course correction even harder. So the next time you read how someone is “the worst” or a Nazi, ask yourself if you are truly aiming for the erasure of Nazi crimes and further fracturing of society or simply exaggerating to highlight a point. One person’s exaggeration becomes someone else’s truth.
- Closing the Dept. of Education
- An anti-vaxx, anti-flouridation nut for HHS
- A traitorous Putin-lover for DNI
- Head of DOD throwing Ret. Gen. Kellogg's work and Ukraine under the bus
- The world's richest man ransacking government with unvetted persons on a plan to commit maximum chaos and destruction
- HN flagging, censoring, and condoning what amounts to fascism rather than promoting rule of law, common sense, and freedom of speech
When ICE starts detaining people who go up against them online (https://theintercept.com/2025/02/11/ice-immigration-social-m...), it won't just be poor brown folks being memory-holed.
Also some countries are denying landing of removal flights because, from what I hear, the current removals contain people with violent criminal records in nations other than America but may well include non-violent people being thrown out for reasons of paperwork simply to make mandated quotas.
This is not to say the other concerns aren't valid.
South Africa has largely decided to align itself with countries who act against the US interest and there is also a not insignificant sentiment against American intervention / involvement in other countries ("empire").
This is what withdrawal looks like. Assistance often comes with strings attached.
In my view, the withdrawal by America of intervention and support of liberal democracy around the world would be a detriment all around, but this is apparently what the American voter and many people from other countries prefer. That means in many cases throwing out the baby with the bathwater, so to speak.
To be fair, HN kind of has to do this. Y Combinator has close ties with the world's richest man; he is even scheduled to speak at AI Startup School. Otherwise, people like dang and others may be subject to retaliation.
We're just trying to make an internet forum that doesn't suck and doesn't burn itself to a crisp—same as it ever was. I know that's not very hot and exciting, but it's how it is.
Also, politics is supposed to be off-limits here but I sure noticed a change in tolerance for blatantly political posts after the elections. Maybe Dang can give a reason for why it suddenly is acceptable to criticise the sitting government where such posts where hidden with warnings about 'only using HN for political purposes' during the last regime. Is it simply because those posts got flagged while posts like this one get upvoted? If so it shows where the voting system fails in creating an open environment for wide-ranging discussion on topics of interest since it creates an echo chamber where only certain political ideas are tolerated while the rest is greyed out.