Just curious to know if you see the following trend:
As a codebase matures, the amount of time spent of code maintenance increases and with bug fixes, it gets harder to spot them and the amount of code that is required to solve them is little.
As a codebase matures, the amount of time spent of code maintenance increases and with bug fixes, it gets harder to spot them and the amount of code that is required to solve them is little.
https://lethain.com/managing-technical-quality/ discusses when it makes sense to build such a team.
One says that they have spent the last couple of years fixing bugs and analyzing the CI builds. The other talks about leading major new initiatives or being responsible for a major new feature and I dig into it. Guess which one I’m going to hire?
In the terms of promo docs, which shows more “impact”, “scope” and “dealing with ambiguity”?