It doesn't help that the CEO actively antagonized a large portion of the site not too long ago.
It doesn't help that the CEO actively antagonized a large portion of the site not too long ago.
It's not that different from what Facebook is doing with Threads. They are not interested in making money from social media, they are just hoping they can become the main infrastructure provider.
- mastodon.green
- social.lol
- communick.com
- cloud68.co
- elest.io
x.com
abc.xyz
> TLDR: I am looking for new developers and maintainers for Takahē who want to help in exchange for my mentorship, or I'll have to sunset the project.
https://aeracode.org/2023/11/06/life-critical-side-projects/
The repo is still being updated so it doesn't look like it's in too much danger:
Companies/agencies/media institutions are not interested in being trailblazers, so they will just go where they see their audience going, meaning Bluesky nowadays. On the other side, the absolute majority of end users still believe that (free) social media is not something worth paying for, and the most you'll see is people that contribute a few dollars per year "to cover hardware costs".
I love that this statement could apply to either Tumblr or WordPress. CEOs are such an expensive liability lately.
I don't think there are many platforms in which users are willing to give the platform money.
If you asked me whether I'd give money to support Reddit, I'd say just let it crash and burn.
Reddit gold is a pale version of this. Neither Twitter nor Bluesky show any signs of getting it.
If we're talking hypothetical right ways, I think what "social" media gets wrong is to envision an anarchy for its users. People are never equal in a society. A teenager isn't the same thing as an elder, nor is a doctor the same thing as a nurse.
I think I've read before that anarchy doesn't work because eventually people find someone who is reliable and naturally that person becomes their authority on the subject, creating an hierarchy.
Social media tries to put all users in the same bucket even when it's well-known that most users belong in the "never posts anything" bucket while very few users belong in the "power user" bucket. There are passive users and active users.
While hierarchies can become ugly fast, I don't think resigning on implementing them in any form is the right answer, specially now that everyone is on the Internet.
The article is saying the opposite though: they are not adding federation directly to Tumblr's own codebase. Instead, federation will come about from some planned future migration of Tumblr onto WordPress.com infrastructure, which already has that feature.
The public blog network is a minority of traffic. If you've never actually been a Tumblr user, you won't have an understanding of the product at all.