This is generally regarded by engineer-types as false, but societal taboos and power structures can be revealed by noting what speech provokes the strongest reactions.
I'm not sure what links you try to show and what you try to argue here though.
Ok I'll bite. Who is the marginalized Other?
This will appear as common sense or naturally true if you're inside the LLMs-cant-reason ideology.
Lot of game playing going on here to center on a victim narrative.
I don't know whether it's past the mark enough to be considered a "taboo" yet, but the other comment replying to him is certainly treating it as taboo. I would note that many, many other people particularly in academia/important society act the same way as the other commenter. I'd also note I have felt strong social pressure to not hold the beliefs I hold about LLM's capacity for reasoning, including actually losing meaningful social status.
Probably worth remembering that different subcultures have different taboos.
That is not how oppression and power work. That's not how discussion works. That not how Foucault's analysis of power works.
That doesn't mean that a silicon based reasoning entity is an ontological impossibility. But if it is to become a reality, it's not necessarily through LLM that such an entity will be spawn.