Hacker News Reader

Comment by sunnybeetroot | Hacker News Reader

Wouldn’t just trailing solve your issue?

    SELECT
    a,
    b,
    c,
    From Foo

View on HN

in 20 years of writing SQL, preceding commas is so much better IMO. Its so easy to miss a comma at the end of a long expression. preceding commas means you can never forget them.

Then if I can have an extra leading comma, I can reorder, comment out or remove, or add a column at any point in the list without having to think about the rest of the projection. Also diffs are cleaner, it only highlights the rows that have changed, not the row above it/below it that had its comma added or removed. This happens a ton when im iterating on a query.

It's only easy to miss a comma at the end of a long expression because you need to calculate whether it should be there in the first place. If commas were always required unconditionally, it wouldn't be a problem.

its still a problem if you forget to write it, and with a trailing comma its often that you forget it because theyre hard to see

Moved the problem to column C

But if this change is adopted, then commenting out column C would still compile the query. There isn’t a need for leading?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com