Hacker News Reader

Comment by JumpCrisscross | Hacker News Reader

I have invested in hedge funds as an individual. Your proposals would be great for me; less competition. I’m sceptical of the public benefits, though there is absolutely a political bloc who will like the optics of banning public investments in HFs and PE.

> private equity, which is a high fee structure built to hide losses over long term periods

Empirically false.

The problem with PE is the same as HFs: fees and dispersion of outcomes.

View on HN

by all means, keep letting those charlatans take your money.

Are you denying that private equity avoids reporting standards that are mandated for public companies?

> private equity avoids reporting standards that are mandated for public companies?

So do startups and small businesses. I’ve made money in both (as well as hedge funds).

Good investments aren’t measured by consultant spam. I’d be furious if my managers burned my money on e.g. commissioning boiler plate risk factors.

private equities and startups/small businesses are fundamentally different in terms of the 'skin in the game' that startup founders and small business owners have in their business. They've typically invested themselves significant parts of their lives into their businesses. The same cannot be said of private equity funds, and you should know better.

> terms of the 'skin in the game' that startup founders

I’ve done a startup. My skin in the game was significant, but I was less dependent on the outcome of the startup than I was keeping my job earlier in my career.

In any case, fraudsters also have lots of skin in the game. This argument is irrelevant to the irrelevance of public reporting requirements, or the empirical track record of private equity for LPs.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com