> private equity, which is a high fee structure built to hide losses over long term periods
Empirically false.
The problem with PE is the same as HFs: fees and dispersion of outcomes.
Are you denying that private equity avoids reporting standards that are mandated for public companies?
So do startups and small businesses. I’ve made money in both (as well as hedge funds).
Good investments aren’t measured by consultant spam. I’d be furious if my managers burned my money on e.g. commissioning boiler plate risk factors.
I’ve done a startup. My skin in the game was significant, but I was less dependent on the outcome of the startup than I was keeping my job earlier in my career.
In any case, fraudsters also have lots of skin in the game. This argument is irrelevant to the irrelevance of public reporting requirements, or the empirical track record of private equity for LPs.
The main problem to me is everyone wants to tell everyone else what to do "for the good of society" but over my lifetime this has been a slow acting cultural poison.
Less than 20 years ago it cost me $7 a trade for one side and that was the cheap revolutionary price for the retail investor. Today it cost me ZERO. That is because of hedge funds. I doubt this will last forever because someone will come along and "fix" what is not broken "for the good of society".