In which case, why isn't this prominently displayed on the main page? Or why not use a Harvard library URL, which will significantly boost the trust level? Especially vs a CC TLD which are known to be problematic?
As an innovation lab we often minimize Harvard branding with project websites because it's more instructive to win or lose on our own merits than based on how people feel about Harvard, in either direction.
Harvard has been around for hundreds of years, Harvard has inbuilt trust, Harvard has funding. You should negotiate and arrange going behind its brand.
It's in several US states' interest to make sure this service keeps existing.
But I am also wondering , is this sustainable , can I use this to archive this hackernews itself for example
And how can we verify the integrity of the web archive , could you please explain?
Thanks a lot in advance. I wish you all the best in your career & this project!