This sounds more like an insight into how things are working at open ai than anything else. And I’m not sure if deep seek and others are going to follow his nice rules.
More generally, transistors are a technical phenomenon…they are either smaller (and work) or don’t. The thing I really don’t feel enough folks appreciate about AGI is it’s a social phenomenon - not in the making of it but in the pragmatic reality of it.
To a sufficient number of folks the current version is AGI, I see students every day trust it more than themselves. To bosses it also might be, if it’s more intelligent than you average employee than that’s sufficiently general intelligence to replace them. So far, I’ve really tried but don’t beyond generating the most basic outline I have yet to find a model that helps with my work, so it’s not intelligent for me.
I’m aware of the benchmarks but they don’t matter outside of places like HN. intelligence is and, likely, will always be social before it is technical and that makes these laws..not useful?