The Humble Music Bundle
humblebundle.com
humblebundle.com
Also if anyone from humble bundle is reading this. Linux users are usually your biggest donators insulting them twice in your video is not a great place to be. (im not even a linux user but it was a negative note in a pretty upbeat video). Edit: Yes I am aware that it was probably in good faith but it really did not fit into the video (hence my comment). I was not personally affected because I dont use linux so im not sure how actual users felt.
It didn't seem like it was insulting linux (or its users) to me, either the artist was reading from a script and really didn't know what linux was, or it was just a mild joke playing off the fact that your average person doesn't. Seemed fairly harmless to me, and linux users are overrepresented in the humble bundle so the context (if it was a joke) is probably appropriate here anyway.
There is a limit on the amount of times something can succeed based on good will, eventually it has to meet a need or provide value.
The Humble Bundle is already a very powerful brand, this will succeed without the need for good will, although I do think "good will" purchases are a noticeable portion of Humble Bundle sales, but not a significant amount.
he talks like he tried to learn what to say from previous hibundles ('no steam codes'). just a joke. kind of funny too.
(and can I take the opportunity to thank you for the great work, I love HIBs and 'buy' them all)
Why is this?
Jokes aside, Linux users are by definition more attracted to the concept of community and independence. Hence their support to people who believe in the same things.
I would guess that a significant percentage of Linux users that buy the Humble Bundles are developers/scientists. These groups create content themselves and therefore they might value content (and especially DRM-free content) higher than other groups.
It might be really interesting if the Humble Bundlers collected some basic demographics.
Here's an (apparently old, with source material no longer hosted on EFF's site) example:
http://www.brettglass.com/effcritique.html
And recently from David Lowery:
http://thetrichordist.wordpress.com/2012/04/15/meet-the-new-...
Fifth paragraph: "... Further the new boss through it’s surrogates like Electronic Frontier Foundation seems to be waging a cynical PR campaign that equates the unauthorized use of other people’s property (artist’s songs) with freedom. A sort of Cyber –Bolshevik campaign of mass collectivization for the good of the state…er .. I mean Internet. I say cynical because when it comes to their intellectual property, software patents for instance, these same companies fight tooth and nail."
So while some sort of music camp is a good suggestion, I don't see a problem with the EFF if the artists approve.
The difference is that bundle had a ton of albums whereas here it's only a handful. I expected also to see a more game-centric flavour to the soundtracks -- considering the pedigree of the Humble Bundle -- instead of stuff like They Might be Giants.
http://musicrage.org/ http://indie-allstars.com/ http://www.reddit.com/r/Music/comments/x74i5/the_humble_musi...
There are some benefits to that - there's no way to make a mistake with they're/their... they're two completely different words!
That's pure quibbling on my part but I'd prefer to download a directory as BitTorrent supports that and I wouldn't have to unzip anything.
https://torrentfreak.com/unpack-rar-archives-before-you-rele...