AI Demos
aidemos.meta.com
aidemos.meta.com
Segment Anything 2: Create video cutouts and other fun visual effects with a few clicks.
Seamless Translation: Hear what you sound like in another language.
Animated Drawings: Bring hand-drawn sketches to life with animations.
Audiobox: Create an audio story with A1-generated voices and sounds.
Not accessible if you're in Illinois or Texas.
They must have anti-AI laws, probably with voice conversion moreso than image segmentation and cartoon animation.
Hopefully the lawmakers see beneficial use cases and fix their laws to target abuse instead of a blanket coarse-grained GenAI restriction.
Knowing meta they save all of it.
Heartland v. Kraft Foods is worth a read.
In this case it’s not the patent trolls, but the biometric collection acts shared by Illinois and Texas.
Aside - if you use Clear for airport security in those states, you get an additional consent screen. It seems like about 50% of the time the Clear employee clicks through the consent screen before you can read it. I imagine this does not fulfill the legal requirements when that happens.
https://s.hdnux.com/photos/01/47/20/26/27067779/3/ratio3x2_9...
SECURITY NOTICE
Electronic Genital Verification (EGV)
Your genitalia may be photographed electronically during your use of this facility as part of the Electronic Genital Verification (EGV) pilot program at the direction of the Office of the Lieutenant Governor. In the future, EGV will help keep Texans safe while protecting your privacy by screening for potentially improper restroom access using machine vision and Artificial Intelligence (AI) in lieu of traditional genital inspections.
At this time images collected will be used solely for model training purposes and will not be used for law enforcement or shared with other entities except as pursuant to a subpoena, court order or as otherwise compelled by legal process.
Your participation in this program is voluntary. You have the right to request the removal of your data by calling the EGV program office at (512) 463-0001 during normal operating hours (Mon-Fri 8AM-5PM).
If I take a photo of you, that's a record of face geometry.
The Meta FAIR demos turned on my webcam because I didn't notice that was enabled when allowing audio. They grabbed a photo of me without my permission, with no purpose as far as I can tell. That should be illegal.
However, posting a photo of a public space in a news article? That seems to fall under the same provision.
Of course, if this trend of state-specific restrictions continues, networks might want to invest in actually having per-state IP ranges.
I speak English and Spanish, so I recorded some English sentences and listened to the Spanish output it generated. It came damn close to my own Spanish (although I have more Castilianisms in mine, which of course I wouldn't expect it to know)
I'm bilingual and still can't understand him. I'm not even sure half the things he says are actual words.
I also tried speaking German and translating it to English and when I said "Hallo ich wollte das nur mal ausprobieren" (Hello I just wanted to try this out) it translated it to "Hi, how are you? Do you know anyone who quit smoking?".
I feel gaslit.
It put me off from actually trying it, I might reconsider.
We released inference code and weights, you can check our github here: https://github.com/kyutai-labs/hibiki
They are going to do everything they can to make sure no one uses the time that models and data centers are limiting factors to disrupt them.
In the same way google demonetized the application layer of the web to prevent walled gardens from blocking search.
If models and hardware become commoditized at the end of the race meta will have a complete psychographic profile of people on an individual and group level to study, and serve incredibly targeted content to.
Their only real competition in that would be someone developing a 'her' like app that takes people out of social media and into their own individual silo'ed worlds. In a lot of ways discord is the alternative world to meta's ecosystem. hyper focused invite only small communities.
I take it you have not tried the new Gemini models on ai studio? It does real time streaming video input and conversation you can genuinely ask it questions about what you are looking at in a conversational audio in-out way. This is basically "her"-level technology in an unpolished form, right here today.
Will those walls keep AI-generated content out, or will they keep the people outside from accessing the AI-generated content in the garden?
If it's the first, somebody should tell them the slop's already up to their navels and they probably shouldn't be helping people generate more of it.
If it's the second, then the models that supply the content to the garden must have some kind of uniqueness/value, because otherwise you could get identical content from anywhere.
This is a genuine question, because I don't understand the logic here.
(I had assumed it was more like hardware companies funding open source way back when - Commoditize Your Complement).
One would imagine Meta can readily quantify how much AI-generated content is consumed across its properties.
Meta's play is simple: more engagement means more money for Meta, and this can be done by "slop" as you called it, or alternatively expanding the audience of high quality human-generated content, say via translation. A funny video in Albanian is probably still very funny after being translated to English.
Apple tried that and it’s crumbling. Meta/Zuckerfuck is always behind the curve.
- AR (failed)
- “metaverse” (failed)
The only thing that has kept them above water is social media and selling off user data, and that’s crumbling as well. Smaller players have been eating their lunch and the user base is aging out.
The writing is on the wall, and his "falling in line" with theb political climate speaks volumes on his effort to keep Meta afloat.
Talk to any staff+ eng at Meta in Ads and they will tell you there's a lot of low hanging fruit left. Sure the music will stop eventually (it always does) but there's no evidence that's soon.
People need to separate their hatred of Meta/Zuck from an objective analysis of the company. Meta has been and continues to be an amazing stock to own.
This is an incredibly generous way to admit that Meta failed their pivot to VR and they will probably never recoup the tens of billions of dollars that was spent on it.
They were instead talking about the implications of GPDR, how they are switching to secure multiparty computation to try and side step restrictions, the looming threat of other data restrictions coming onto the scene soon internationally, the aging userbase, the concern they can't trace who is buying what via ads anymore (i.e. did that sneaker ad result in a Nike purchase), etc. They either didn't have any low hanging fruit left, or were certainly tight lipped about it.
Better moderation (to the extent they still care)
Generation of AI slop for the sheep to feed on
Use of AI is really core to their business, so understandable they want to build it themselves, but not so clear why they want to "open source" (weights) it other than to harm companies like OpenAI
I personally think that the population scale surveillance and behavioral manipulation infrastructure built by meta is unethical and incredibly dangerous.
I keep telling parents that Meta et al are spending the inflation-adjusted equivalent of the Manhattan project — not to defeat Japan — but to addict their child.
I think atomic power or even better drugs / medicines is actually a good analogy considering the dual use nature of the stuff that they are building. Can improve quality of life if used prudently and responsibly, or cause devastation if not.
Joel Spolsky in 2002 identified a major pattern in technology business & economics: the pattern of “commoditizing your complement”, an alternative to vertical integration, where companies seek to secure a chokepoint or quasi-monopoly in products composed of many necessary & sufficient layers by dominating one layer while fostering so much competition in another layer above or below its layer that no competing monopolist can emerge, prices are driven down to marginal costs elsewhere in the stack, total price drops & increases demand, and the majority of the consumer surplus of the final product can be diverted to the quasi-monopolist. No matter how valuable the original may be and how much one could charge for it, it can be more valuable to make it free if it increases profits elsewhere. A classic example is the commodification of PC hardware by the Microsoft OS monopoly, to the detriment of IBM & benefit of MS.
This pattern explains many otherwise odd or apparently self-sabotaging ventures by large tech companies into apparently irrelevant fields, such as the high rate of releasing open-source contributions by many Internet companies or the intrusion of advertising companies into smartphone manufacturing & web browser development & statistical software & fiber-optic networks & municipal WiFi & radio spectrum auctions & DNS (Google): they are pre-emptive attempts to commodify another company elsewhere in the stack, or defenses against it being done to them.
If their business remains a shitty declining buggy 20-year-old Facebook and a 10+year-old Instagram app, but they contribute to advancing open source models similar to how they did with React, I'll consider that a net win though.
Arguably this would be kind of rational behaviour for them even if they thought that LLM stuff had a low chance of being the next thing; they have lots and lots of money, and lots of revenue, so one strategy would be just to latch on to every new fad, and then if one is a real thing they don't get left behind (and if it's not, well, they can afford it).
My suspicion is that this is where most Big Tech interest in LLMs comes from; it's essentially risk management.
These and others are just side benefits or some form of "greenwashing". Meta's main (and only) business is advertisement. They failed to capitalize on everything else.
People who think Meta's main business focus is Facebook and Instagram don't pay attention.
Also, the business doesn't need to be reinvigorated. It is booming and they are investing in places to stack more gains down the road & cement current status, which investors like to see. Many big techs right now are flailing and trying to artificially keep profits up by slashing costs only and not increasing revenue, which dents innovation. Meta is managing to sink money into AR/VR AND AI while seeing big revenue growth.
Not that I'm complaining about their open-weights model releases destroying openai's moat... but still.
I think this is it. I'm kicking myself for not going harder, but I was very much into LLMs/ML back in 2019, had I not given up I might have a startup right now.
I'd need like 70k and a minimum of 6 months, but I still have a few ideas for AI driven startups.
With Meta I can’t think of a single existing vertical where AI would be desirable. Maybe Quest
This is why cutting edge models are delayed in certain regions.
The work to verify and document all of the compliance isn’t worth it for various small demos, so they probably marked it as only allowed in the US and certain regions.
"Allow the use of cookies from Meta on this browser? We use cookies and similar technologies to help provide and improve content on . We also use them to provide a safer experience by using information we receive from cookies on and off Meta Quest, and to provide and improve Meta Products for people who have an account.
•
Essential cookies: These cookies are required to use Meta Products and are necessary for our sites to work as intended.
•
Cookies from other companies: We use these cookies to show you ads off of Meta Products and to provide features like maps and videos on Meta Products. These cookies are optional.
should I click on accept?
EDIT: Once accessed there is this note:
> This research demo is not open to residents of, or those accessing the demo from, the States of Illinois or Texas.
and I'm in TX
Even a passing glance it would be immediately clear that it's not a real risk of any sort.
I did the same technique years ago for estimating ages. Person uploads an image, helps align 10% of our facial landmark points, and run the estimator. If we were wrong, ask for correction and refine.
Its still cool and all, but meh based on my prior experience.
What the shit is this?
Like when some junk food isn't available in my country, I think it's probably for the best.