Why blog if nobody reads it?
andysblog.uk
andysblog.uk
Credibility is a very valuable commodity. It's worth investing in ways to build more of it.
Don't assume people will stumble across your content (though they will eventually via Google). Actively send links to people who you are already engaged in conversation with.
It's not the number of readers you have that matters: it's their quality. I'll take a dozen people reading my stuff who might engage with me usefully or lead to future opportunities over a thousand readers who don't match that criteria.
I was starting https://golfcourse.wiki and I read a bunch by Jimmy Wales, and he focused on his own credibility and openness being a linchpin to wikipedia.
I thought I might as well start a blog then, because in a world of golf media, with few exceptions is mostly a just corporate funded advertisement-as-entertainment slop. I figured I could at least stand out by openly talking about golf in a very different way, by just writing for me, with my target demo being my best golf friend, who sadly passed about the same time I started the blog.
I've got myself a small audience (a few hundred subscribers, and maybe a fourth of that read regularly. I'm more than happy with that. My ideas are almost diametrically opposed to much of the golf world, but I spend a ton of time on almost all of the articles, and I'm very proud of them. I think it lets people who might use the wiki know how serious I am about the wiki as something good for golf not as some way to get rich. I think it does a good job, and it's a good way to waste a few hours/days/weeks.
Blogging has internal benefits of organizing thoughts or even just being a fun hobby. But it's external validation as well. Sure, writing a book is even more but that's probably 100s of times more work.
How is it being received by those people? I can't help but imagine the response being:
"Okay but then what's the point of us sitting here with beers?"
EDIT:
If I was hanging out talking with someone, and have them terminate an interesting conversation topic by plugging their blog article, I'd feel cut off, and might even start to wonder if they're really seeing me as a friend or colleague, or is this networking for them?
It's not the blog reference itself, but rather cutting off a conversation topic this way, that would irk me in such situation.
Anyone can generate a big portfolio of projects these days(be it graphics, video, software, writing etc) but blog posts from 2023 and before are proof and undeniable.
I always read blogs if people include them in resumes.
It’s really cool when an applicant has a blog with unique and interesting content, but I can’t remember this happening without us already having been very impressed by the candidate’s resume.
More commonly, blog content was ambiguous about the applicant’s skills. For example, when someone applies to an embedded job but has a blog of beginner level Arduino projects, is that because they’re an expert creating tutorials for beginners, or because they are a beginner and these entry-level projects represent their skill level?
I also think people greatly overestimate the idea that someone will LLM their way into a great blog, and they greatly underestimate the difficulty of forging timestamps. Even git timestamps are easy to fake. Your interviewers aren’t going to scrutinize the Wayback machine for evidence, but not being indexed isn’t proof that it wasn’t there anyway.
There is no reason why you have to write a blog over a long period of time, you could quickly pump out several blog posts and link to them to establish credibility quickly.
LOL. I could easily do it "back in those days". The difference is that in my particular case (I specialize in developing new software products for clients) I also have long list of names with actual phone numbers, emails, addresses etc. So anyone can call and verify.
Never blogged. Have no time / desire
Using that as a first pass has led to more time engaging with thoughtful people about well considered ideas, and less time listening to the noise that shows up when you solicit opinions.
Several of my posts received 100k+ views, one with 1M+, typically exploring minor technical hacks. A couple posts resulted in minor sales of bespoke hardware adapters, which was a nice "side hustle" for a few years. None of this would ever had made me rich, but it was a neat introduction to information sharing.
My resumé still lists several articles written about my blogposts, in publications including Wired, Hack-A-Day, &c... although the links obviously haven't worked for over a decade.
I've recently registered a new domain for my next blog attempt, which will mostly just be a record of things I find interesting on that particular day. If you ever read Whole Earth Catalogue, my hope is for my own modern-day version of the excellent WEC-inspired https://kk.org/cooltools/ [not me/mine].
1M+ is definitely no one
The initial reason behind my blog was sharing fun solutions from my work. If I get it approved in a blog post then I can talk about it publicly. Working in game development that's a fairly rare opportunity. I usually share my posts on Reddit for just a handful of nods and a random question or two.
However, I recently had an interview where the interviewers had read my blog and used it as a basis to steer their questions. At that point having put such thought and effort into it felt well worth it. I do believe it's a part of what got me the job.
There is a reason Andrej Karpathy has such a great reputation. His credentials are impressive, but the quality of his teaching content is spectacular.
Unfortunately, these days writing a publicly-available blog is also a great way to train AI to replace you at the very job you're establishing credibility in.
Alas, that ship has sailed. So keep writing blogs.
Or the other way around
For the majority of these minor observances, almost no one showed up. Maybe you'd get a couple of old ladies but otherwise the church was completely empty. We'd be doing this elaborate stage show for no one.
It made me think of a history YouTube video I watched about some ancient religion. The priests had a complex daily ritual including setting out meals for the Gods, saying certain prayers including certain physical movements like bowing, prostrating, raising their hands. They would have to do certain cleaning rituals including incense and sweeping. Super elaborate stuff. But it was all in an inner chamber and no one would come and even watch them. They just did this ritual for no one.
I suppose I think it is interesting to see a parallel here. Like, us tech people are spiritual hermits, cargo-culting our own incantations. We're keeping a tradition alive that in only rare cases actually has an audience because we have a some faith in its utility.
In the pre-1970 Catholic mass, the priest faced the altar and spoke in Latin. The mass was changed in 1970 so the priest faces the people and speaks in the vernacular. The shift in understanding is clear. Religion used to be about God, and about our obligations to and relationships with Him. This was true across all religions. Now, most people think of it as primarily a community building exercise. This modern mindset is the only context in which your comment makes sense. Premodern catholics would be baffled at it
I was actually envisioning something closer to the monastery that Alyosha was a part of in The Brothers Karamazov. It reminds me of the cliché admonishment of priests that pray in the streets (something that pops up in the Bhagavad Gita long before it does in the words of Jesus). It is worth pondering the lengths to which monks would go to prove their holiness was genuine and not the result of seeking attention.
It is true that at the time of my writing the comment, the top comment was a popular blogger extolling the benefits of clout that one might gain from writing a blog that gains some following. But in general, that is a feat most will never achieve. For the rest, they are more like the premodern adherents, doing the ritual for some other reason. The blog post we are discussing is literally about that kind of self-justification.
If you know you will not (or perhaps should not) blog to gain an audience, why should you do it?
I'm an atheist, so (knowing there are no gods) should I perform a ritual?
Is the ritual for the gods' benefit, or for mine?
Is the ritual for its own sake, something we do because we have always done it?
Going on vacation or even arriving late was very very frowned upon.
So, seems to depend a lot on the country.
I often feel I _should_ blog more, but then I don't. And every now and again I go and read something I wrote ten years ago and feel a little embarrassed by my past self. But every so often I read something that makes me feel that I _did_ know a few things, or did some cool things, and even if no one else ever read about them it made me feel better ten years in the future and _that_ alone is worth it.
Also, my name is Tom and I'm also a juggler. Weird coincidence to be replying to your username... :-)
I searched high and low and found Obsidian. Now the idea of using OneNote sends shivers down my spine.
It happened to me a few times that I forgot I wrote something down, only to find it via google search.
There starts to be some traffic, I am happy to assume that any person visits my blog for a fix will probably save a good amount of debugging time.
I can also add permalinks to any of the posts from anywhere, and share them in public documentation or bug reports and such, a handy feature.
This is especially useful because link-rot means that resources I was able to uncover might not be available in the future. A few years ago I did a massive amount of research into internals of old unixes for data recovery and maintenance of said systems in the modern era(machines attached to million dollar pieces of testing equipment go away when the machine does). I was maintaining and upgrading(mostly scsi2sd) and backing up systems that all predated y2k. Most of my research references are now dead links to nowhere. I now print to pdf as well as take archive.is links of all my referenced sources.
I'm generally terrible about blogging, but I'm changing that for 2025. I'm now in a position where I'm solutions architecting a lot of things as my primary day job. This makes easy blog post subjects that not only clarify my thoughts and understanding, but end up being the basis for the internal documentation on the subject.
A lot of what I now do is in terraform, cloudformation, golang, or Python. I make sure when I publish my blog post, I include a complete working example. For all my terraform, all one has to do is clone and run terraform apply, after satisfying the barebones prerequisites.
I follow a bunch of developers (surprise surprise) and read mostly technical blogs, I've found a lot of developers mix writing blog posts about their personal and family life alongside technical posts. As I've been reading I've found those are some of my favourite posts, as someone who balancing professional and open source development with parenting, I really love hearing about other people's experiences doing the same. It's not a side that I read much about elsewhere outside of personal blogs.
That's a long way of me saying, keep on blogging strangers, someone might be reading!
As an occasional blog writer myself, I also like to announce manually on my social platforms I use (Mastodon and LinkedIn) when I blogged, and send a link to those socials post. The [full rationale is here][1]. They make it feel less like shouting in the void, which helps me stay motivated. I would be lying if I said I didn't enjoy the occasional likes and boosts I get from these, too :)
Simon Willison also has [good advice on how to write more][2], that I must admit I'm struggling to follow myself.
[1]: https://ergaster.org/posts/2024/03/06-welcoming-feedback/
[2]: https://bsky.app/profile/simonwillison.net/post/3leuudyabks2...
As a follow-up, how do you go about discovering the people you keep up with if they are not personal acquaintances?
However, the process of writing a blog post forces me to invent new workflows and is in itself very educational, so it's not a waste of time or a mistake even if no one reads it.
Not being a blog writer, that seems rather crazy to hear with how "social" the WWW has supposedly gotten. WP claims, there's 33 sites "with at least 100 million (monthly) active users". [1]
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_social_platforms_with_...
Top sites are up at multi-1000 million / month. Sure, some of the top sites (Youtube, Instagram, TikTok) are very heavily video based. Yet, it still seems amazing that with that many users there's so little "sharing" in terms of long form written essays or blogs. That the situation was actually better in terms of referrals before there was all the sharing? Now there's actually less organic referral traffic, and Hacker News is apparently one of the best. Walled garden issues? Better fit of the subject matter to readers? Completely videos everywhere? Decline of reading in general?
Last stats I could find from dang have:
2022, Nov 3, 5M monthly unique, 10M page views a day, 1300 submissions a day: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33454140
2015, Mar 17: 3-3.5M monthly unique, 2.6M page views a day, 300K uniques a day: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9220098
Compared to somewhere like Facebook that supposedly have 3070M monthly uniques, yet apparently produce almost no referral traffic whatsoever, that's a wildly disproportionate ratio of effectiveness for the audience size.
Edit: Taken another way, in what seems like a pessimistic view. If only 1% of Facebook still read long form writing. And only 1% of those actually decided a post was worthy of clicking on. That would still amount to 300,000 views. That seems like a lot.
I agree with the detachment part but when I write about technology, books, ideas/ thoughts, etc. I generally find it 'easier' to imagine as if I am talking to someone in front of me and write in a conversational style. I liked that a couple of my favorite fiction writers used this style and sort of followed it.
I have a personal rule that the cost of doing a side project is I have to blog about it. No regrets on that at all, it's a small thing that can greatly increase the value you derive from the project.
In the moment, writing a blog is a nice way to indicate to myself that something is done. But the process of writing the blog forces me to find some lessons and takeaways, and that makes my next project better.
Ask HN: Is maintaining a personal blog still worth it?
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42685534
Why I still blog after 15 years
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41646531
Advice for a friend who wants to start a blog
Jeff Atwood's (co-founder of Stack Exchange) Coding Horror comes to mind, and how the teenage me was amazed at how someone got offered such a good job with such an amazing office [0] because of blogging.
The smaller, more intimate internet was truly something else.
[0]: https://blog.codinghorror.com/five-things-you-didnt-know-abo...
* I can link people to my carefully considered thoughts on a subject instead of needing to write something up each time.
* While most people don't read what I write, some do, and I've had good conversations and friendships come out of it.
* It makes me a better writer. In my professional life I can write things much faster and better than if I wasn't also blogging for fun.
* LLMs learn from it. Our future may be run by machines, and if so I want my perspective to be one they consider.
Adding one more point:
I am often writing stuff anyways on various open-group or closed-group social media, which is where the interactions are (at least for my case). The blog however becomes a way to collect all those in a single place and where I have more control.
Joking apart this is a very valid point, often you can just fall onto something where people have taken the time to put something out there, you documented your thought or your little haven of work, whatever it is, for other to find eventually. It is nice and valuable.
In a day and age where everything needs to have meaning or be productive, it is healthy to make things that serve no other purpose but to be. It will be eventually lost to time and noise, but so is everyone existence on this earth.
A semi-related story: Freshmen year in college, I was about a week ahead in the sci curriculum and I blogged regularly about novel errors I encountered and how I fixed them. During lab late in the semester, I happen to look up into the next row. I found the duo there reading my blog post.
I think most of us in the technology field tend to forget just how many resources are out there for technical topics and often see blogging as a waste of time or a "whisper in the hurricane" when we should be encouraging people to keep writing about technical topics and more.
I write both technical, and non-technical posts on mine. It is literally one of the few corners of the universe where I can say what goes, what shows, and how it all flows. It is a garden I tend for myself, but others are free to inspect.
I could, as some have suggested, write but not publish it online. But... probably in some way it's the habit from older times when I wrote about programming. In any case I do delete most of the stuff without ever uploading it, and frequently delete a lot of the stuff I did upload.
I write because it helps me seeing it written down. I write because I don't speak much with anyone any more.
I've only just started. How long have you been writing and do you publish it online?
The things I write currently about, it's been a couple of years I guess. I do put it up on my blog, yes. Not all of it, and as I said I do delete some after a while. In general I do consider anything I write as temporary. Deleting things it's also part of the process or something.
At first, I wasn't sure what to make of it. But reading the source, my blog post reminded me of some ideas I had consciously forgotten. The Deep Research report gathered some of those idea and repurposed it in an interesting way. So writing a blog is now a way to resurface ideas you might have forgotten yourself back to you, a kind of "memories" or "timehop" feature.
Sometimes, I am the main beneficiary of my blog posts. But there is a much more practical point than bookmarking my progress — it is a polished resource with carefully selected references.
> One right person. Maybe one day, someone stumbles across your words at exactly the right moment. And that changes something for them.
Sometimes one. Sometimes a few.
In general, I have found that blog posts have a larger impact than my conference talks. At a conference, say, with 100 people in the audience, perhaps only 20 find it relevant. With a blog post, we may feel disappointed that only 1,000 people read it — which is small by blogging standards, but still way more than one would reach at a conference.
I posted a txt "blog" post just a few hours ago just here: https://misc.l3m.in/txt/raw_txt.txt
And here's a list of all the blog posts: https://misc.l3m.in/txt/
i like this minimal fast approach to blogging (also loves bash scripts).
Here's the file:
https://misc.l3m.in/txt/createfile.sh
I use it like this:
./createfile.sh file_name # without the extension!
I then edit the file using vim, save it, and it's published :)(the three first bytes the bash script write to the txt file is the BOM, used by the browser to know that it's dealing with utf-8 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byte_order_mark)
My blog is https://lmno.lol/alvaro (also at https://xenodium.com)
I like your 'fortune cookie' that provides a username for frictionless onboarding!
> If I write it, they will come. They won’t. There are billions of blog posts out there. The internet is an infinite void, and your blog is a whisper in a hurricane.
This has not proven to be true over a long enough window.I've kept a blog of some kind since 2005 and I'm always surprised looking at the traffic what posts get picked up by Google and end up driving traffic for one reason or another. One of my posts is prominent enough that I recently started to notice inbound traffic from ChatGPT (I assume it is being cited as authoritative on the subject).
A few years back, I started on Medium with 0 readers and just started writing. 100 ticked by and it was a small milestone. Then 500, then 1000. Just write in your authentic voice; don't think about an audience.
There are literally thousands of videos on recipes for omelettes (example) on YT, yet more are published every day. The thing is, there's a video and a voice for every audience.
It's an obvious hyperbole but I think it stands to show that, in a similiar fashion, there is a reader (and by some aggregation readers plural) for everything you might think of writing.
How to get started with web development in 2025? What is ray-casting? How to emulate a piece of hardware in <language>? What I had for dinner tonight!
It may not be that everything is viral or a hit but you should find that most of the content you right will resonate with _someone_ and potentially help multiple _someones_.
Sometimes being satisfied with that 10-100 readers is all there is to it.
I blog so that other people read my writing, and fortunately they do, at least sometimes. I don't think I'd continue if there was no public interest.
Maybe parallel: I notice when, for example, I edit videos in my own world I have a very different take on the edit when I am showing it to someone for the first time.
Thinking to myself: "Now as I watch someone else watching it, I am become aware that this scene goes on a bit too long. This cut is a little abrupt, disorienting."
I didn't "see" those until I had an audience.
Is that good, though? If the product is purely for self-consumption, is the audience-anticipating version necessarily the better version?
And at what point, after how many unread blog posts, do you rationally stop anticipating an audience?
Henrik Karlsson has a good series of posts on this subject: https://www.henrikkarlsson.xyz/p/writing-to-think
I journal daily about a topic I pull off a backlog of ideas. After the end of my allotted journaling time, if I think “there are more threads here to uncover,” I spend more time on it. If I feel confident, I clean it up into a blog post.
Obligatory link to my own blog: https://www.seanmcloughl.in
I often have difficulty getting topics out of my head until I write them out. Some thing I will publish that I’ve had bouncing around for a year or more and then it just stops once I publish it.
I’ve been lucky to have a few things I wrote get traction on here over the years and that’s been pretty cool.
(I use blogger and, in fact, after much deliberation just decided to roll everything (personal and business) together on my existing template.) Anything else was just too much trouble and probably cost. Zero interest in self-hosting.
If you believe consciousness is a way for the universe to know itself, then expressing your truth in a blog is a way to participate in that process. The random assortment of atoms that make up "you" are gifting the universe a novel creation that could not have existed otherwise.
Whether you think this is of value is a different topic, but at the very least, it's a neat mindset to slip into IMO.
I treat my blog as a sort of extended dating profile or resume. It's extended in both scope and completeness, attracting all sorts of people for all sorts of purposes, and telling them much more about me than a mere bio. It's a search query for other interesting people, as someone else put it.
If someone will read it or not is out of your control, and it's completely unpredictable.
Using some examples of mine:
1. Once I wrote a blog post about writing a quicksort in Python using only lambdas, based on the lambda calculus theory which I found very interesting and challenging to explain in clear way. Some people liked it, but it was not proportional to the hard work involved: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38848905
2. Once a friend asked me why I write my scripts in Ruby, I told him a few reasons and I wrote in my blog just as a personal reference, to have in hands if someone else asks me the same thing. Turns out that it reached the #1 here in HN and even the creator of Ruby tweeted about it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40763640
So, don't do it for the others. Do it for yourself. And I won't say "keep doing it and someday someone will see", I can't guarantee that, but a least you'll have a chance.
1. Blogging is a very good way to help sorting out own ideas and shape thoughts on a particular topic. Unless you write it down and try to express your idea coherently, thoughts are just bouncing inside your head without proper actionable output. I notices from my own experience that ideas form and progress much better when I write them down.
2. Blogging is helpful as a form of journalling about particular topic—to return to later. Sometimes I read my old posts to refresh my memory and often get surprised that it was written by me—after some time I forget what was the logic that led me to a particular idea or descision and old posts look like written by somebody else.
3. Blogging helps to discipline oneself. Writing and editing takes time and effort. Only regular stable blogging attracts any audience at all. Not that it's important, but it's good feeling when somebody finds what you wrote helpful. Many just want to get audience without understanding what it really takes. It's not that easy. So, as a byproduct of the first two points, one learns what it takes to produce good content with a regular cadence.
It takes effort to carefully write, edit, and rewrite. But it really helps with our own thought process, improve ability to shape ideas, helps save sorted out ideas for later, and disciplines ourselves.
So, I'd say blogging is a pure self-improvement exercise—fitness for the mind.
I never told these to myself. I have been running a blog before it was called blog.
My primary goal was and continues to be as a reference to things I wanted to learn, explore, clarify, digest, break down, track, and so on. The public part is a simple side effect that historically, it was cumbersome to have synchronized devices and such for records or logs. A public "blog" where I am the only one with read/write is a simple way to solve this problem.
It is more of a journal to myself of "to dos" and "here i am in this project" so I can come back to it six months (or years) later and can restart it.
> Blogging forces clarity. It makes you structure your thoughts, sharpen your perspective.
Sure. that is one way to say why I have a log on the web. Has noting to two initial points.
And, this is why it is
User-agent: *
Disallow: /Old writing is constantly reinvigorated by new readers. In fact, that is the only way that it can continue to live. It is the responsibility of the reader to decide whether a piece of writing is important or not in their context.
As such, I’ve been blogging quite a bit. Because posting on a blog allows for the critical mass of future readers. Anything interesting that I happen to say can be found through a medium that reaches billions of people.
Today, or in the future.
HTTP is basically the printing press. And my website is my media company.
Just because billions of people aren’t consistently reading what’s written, doesn’t mean that the writer has lost their responsibility to write.
The other half are me deep-diving into random corners of history, geography, philosophy, economics, anthropology, politics, and the like. I REALLY enjoy writing those articles: both the actual writing of the words; and the hours upon hours spent lost in a smoky haze of Wikipedia, public datasets, Google Books, journal articles, other peoples' blogs, YouTube videos, and so on. AFAIK those articles get few hits, and that's fine with me, it's just my hobby.
"A blog post is a very long and complex search query to find fascinating people and make them route interesting stuff to your inbox"
That's me. I've made everyday slice of life pictures, walking about, since 2006. Biggest source of traffic is probably my mom. I don't care, its my own little corner of the internet.
I once read from a comment in HN or a blog saying that, in the future writing will be like workout; in the past the daily physical labors forced people to build muscle on some aspects, but technology freed people from the labors as well as the muscles. Now if you want to build muscle you have to workout. Writing and organized thinking is going to be like that in the future: only those who wish to and take action to build organized thinking muscle will have them.
That is why to me writing itself is valuable, even if nobody reads it. Bonus points if somebody stumbles across my blog and it somehow builds my credibility.
In my case, I wrote because I enjoy writing and often reread my own posts. More than once, I’ve searched for something online only to have the search engine direct me right back to my own site.
[1]: https://rednafi.com
Provide something from one human to the other, just like i would help someone lost in the street and not try to sell him a map, is just the right thing to do.
It doesn't have to make me popular, or benefit me in the slightest way.
If one was to do it only for their own benefit, I'm not sure blogging would be worth it. Other way are either more efficient or just as good but less time consuming. X or Twitter for instance has better reach than a blog.
I personal sites could easily be found, and filtered, or sorted to provide interesting ones, then Personal sites would be booming.
That is why I created my own domains list: https://github.com/rumca-js/Internet-Places-Database
It contains links with properties in JSON. I can find personal things using "personal" tags. I can filter them using numerical "page_rating_votes".
It's why I upkeep a list of current webrings - https://brisray.com/web/webring-list.htm , a list of personal web directories - https://brisray.com/web/indiedirs.htm - and "alternative" search engines that can find them - https://brisray.com/web/altsearch.htm
Personal sites are not dead. I've got one, and it is entirely fulfilling its function. Other people have them too.
Internet search is pretty broken, I'll agree with you. That said, Kagi and Marginalia both seem to tackle the problems with surfacing old and/or independent content. And people are bypassing the search-engines by constructing link pages, link blogs and web-rings, and seem to be doing fine.
1. A walled garden? Run by Google? Aside from locking this discoverability away in a walled garden, how many years before Google kills it out of corporate disinterest?
2. So, blogs with Google tracking promoted higher? Blogs with copyright information excluded as it is not legal for LLM's to train on it? What do you think would happen?
It's fraught with problems.
All kidding aside, it's something great to point at something when applying for a job. I'll just say this as a person looking at a candidate: I'm probably not gonna look at your Github. Especially if it's filled with simple tutorials from a book or from YouTube that a bunch of other people have followed.
Extra points if I read it and applied the knowledge. This did happen one time. I was stoked.
I'm more likely to look at stuff like a blog post if I really want to gauge your expertise on a subject and see your attention to detail.
Check out my personal blog
If you like it and you're feeling extra generous, you can leave a donation.
Last but not least, your blog is unusable without JS. The posts are not links for some reason, why would you make such a paywall?
https://rxjourneyserver.pythonanywhere.com/rss_feed/rss/
I have fixed the javascript issue with the links
https://buymeacoffee.com/chistev12
I don't have a RSS feed but I have a newsletter with a subscribe button.
What do you mean by posts are not links? You mean you can't click on them to get to the detail page?
Edit: What's wrong with my Twitter account?
- Writing is first and foremost a learning process. I've learned a great deal, such as how to write, present, and persuade, not to mention the immense amount of knowledge I've acquired while researching for my articles.
- Writing is a means of self-expression. It may seem a bit vain, but my point is that by writing, you continually learn and improve each day. This makes you better than you were yesterday, and I believe that looking back on your past achievements will never leave you disappointed.
- Writing is a way to inspire others. Have you ever read an article that completely changed your perspective? That's what I'm talking about. And certainly, you can write to motivate others as well.
- Writing is a way to receive empathy. I think I've "bookmarked" numerous blogs by others who share valuable insights with the community.
- Writing is a way to alleviate stress. I'm not sure if anyone else is like me, but I can spend hours fine-tuning my content, and during those times, I feel truly at ease.
- Lastly, I don't want to stop at just writing blogs. I hope to write a book of my own in the future. Just thinking about it motivates me to work even harder.
It's also fun to go back a year later to see how stupid/naive/ignorant I was 'back then'.
EDIT: since we're linking blogs - https://twomorecents.org :D
Here I have fun with HTML/CSS, can let the graphic designer within me run amok and will try to post semi-regularly about some of my hobbies: computing (mainly programming) and art (music, films, novels).
This website exists for a few reasons, others than those listed in the landing page:
* I wanted to make a generator in Common Lisp during my vacations (I had a very crude one in sh a long time ago) so I did.
* I dislike the modern Web full of Jabbascript, so I thought I'd explore the limits of static HTML5/CSS3. I'm not fully there on that point, but still pretty proud of the file explorer sidebar thingy.
* Like a lot of millennials, I still remember a web that wasn't exclusively a one-way street carrying lackluster content from corporations and "actors" to clueless consumers. So I consider it a pretty important mission to do what I can to help, even if it's just a little blog full of nothing.But blogging for work rather subtracts from the pleasure for me. I know people who originate content and blog for pleasure which is consumed for work. That seems to be a better fit.
I agree with much of the sentiment here. You can diarise, a zettelkasten isn't a bad place to be. Inviting readership constructs a binding, a contract writer to reader. It's building commitment: to produce, and to reflect on what readers say, and to correct honest mistakes and accept (some) criticism with good grace. Shame about the negging: George Megalogenis's blog had a byline up top of the comment pages "my blog, my rules" and you can't really object to that. Boring and abusive replies get chucked. Fair enough.
This helped me realize how powerful the legacy of wikipedia is/will be. When I first started editing (2006), people still didn't trust open source encyclopediae. Same thing with bitcoin, just a few years later.
I suspect (hope) a lot of blog posts are written to share knowledge. In that regard having that knowledge trained in to LLMs (ideally open ones, but even closed ones) could further that goal.
Blogs aren’t the only form of publishing and sharing.
Maybe after the AI winter subsides it might make sense again. A world where people were encouraged to publish to share knowledge ended up being publish to support Google’s hold on the net, now evolved to publish so people can read 5% of what you wrote distilled through statistical summation.
It makes all long form content look bad, not just the bad long form content. It continues to enable the societal trend of only consuming short form content. Which in turn enables reactionary and low information behavior instead of critical thought.
I have lots of things I want to write about but I feel completely anxious about putting my ideas out there, even got relatively simple, straightforward things.
How do you push through the anxiety and actually put things out there?
Lay out your main topic and your initial thoughts. Let it do the anxiety-inducing part.
You just need a starting ground.
Artists who fear the “blank canvas” use a similar strategy - make large, loose brush strokes and create from chaos.
This resonates with me. Many things get more precise when I write down my thoughts or explain them to others.
For my company, I use the blog to explain how my software is working, I'm using blog for that as well. It is a good marketing channel.
I blog because it forces me to understand the subject matter on a deeper level, to write long form, to keep things as interesting as as possible.. and of course the mere active writing increases my ability to retain information.
I don’t really care if you read it, though, if I’m having a disagreement online, I might care in those situations if you would read a specific post.
I really don’t need to be an online celebrity, it’s not important even in the slightest. Ego does not help for anything.
In fact, even when doing public speaking engagements, I often completely omit an introduction to myself. Because the subject matter should speak for itself, it should not be a reflection of my past accomplishments or the name that I have or desire to build into a brand.
In fact, my web server logs show that out of the 170 or so pages on my website, only about 7% receive regular traffic from visitors. The remaining 93% have got only myself as the reader.
I've been web logging the last 25 years and I'll probably continue to do it for as long as I can. In fact, 25 years ago, it was just a website hosting a loose collection of pages. It took its current shape and form only around 2006 when blogging became fashionable!
One exception was when I visited a customer in Shanghai, it turned out that my purely technical blog was blocked in China (at least back then) as it was hosted on a wordpress.com subdomain. I then migrated it my own domain and it was accessible in China too.
The other reason is definitely tech-marketing for my business, but hopefully with 99% quality and 1% noise :-)
That may be mostly true but with the way recommendation engines like substance and social media get new content in front of people it's a little different.
Last month I started a weekly roundup blog about urbanism and with relatively lite marketing efforts and the help of substack recommendations we have almost 100 subscribers already. So share it with the relevant parties but also take advantage of the algos if you can. That being said, I don't really have a plan to monetize so it's more of a passion project to inspire people to take initiative in their local setting.
If you wanna see the project for yourself https://urbanismnow.substack.com
The author very clearly states that the reason is the Buddhist "carry water, chop wood": you do it because it needs doing. You do it because you saw something. You do it for yourself.
Yet a lot of the comments here are more of a utilitarian bent, e.g. "one day someone will see it", "it's for networking", "it's proof you know your stuff", etc. Completely unrelated and maybe even contrary to the meaning of this article/blog post!
1. The ability to be able to link to an in-depth explanation, rather than having to remake the points is convenient.
2. Documenting non-proprietary insights and learnings from commercial work with limited source access.
3. Explaining things is hard, so writing it down and reading it a few days later lets you see it from a different perspective so you can rewrite it more clearly. Hopefully, get better at writing in general over time as well.
I've had a number of topics I've been meaning to document for years, but haven't taken the time. Finished the first one just this weekend though at https://roosimaa.ee
Number one learning so far is writing takes a surprising amount of time.
My take on the matter is here: https://jonpauluritis.com/articles/say-something-that-will-s...
If you're going to write - surprise people and be useful. Write for yourself, but also write for others. It will force you to select ideas that have substance.
Anyway, Great read. Saving this to share for others.
I don't check the stats, the pages are small enough that even if it got busy I'd hardly notice. I write primarily to explore ideas I've had or that I've read from others, or where I feel my thinking lacks clarity and I want to gain that clarity. It's also a place where I experiment a little, taking more chances and risking more failure that I would otherwise in a professional environment. Occasionally I'll find reason to point someone int he direction of a post because it touches on a topic or is otherwise an example of some particular type of thinking, like tearing a page out of a personal diary to show someone.
I would say yes. In my experience, writing your ideas down is an excellent way of learning exactly what those idea are. Until such time as they have been clearly stated, their existence is 'fuzzy'.
Kind of "people who post on the internet, post on the internet".
That includes me, but it's worth pointing out.
It's not limited to this, but in the workplace I think of this as "write it down culture". People who write things down often have the most tested and credible ideas, with the first and most important judge being themselves.
If I see someone’s blog today with posts from last few years of longer, regardless of their current situation, I appreciate that they are fairly intellectual person.
Now I will show myself out and try to start my own blog which I have been procrastinating over for decades.
For example, I was writing a terraform script and I kept getting errors. I would change one thing, run plan and apply, get another error, rinse and repeat until I fixed it. I would like to keep a record of all these errors so that I can document it for my future self or colleagues, but I don't want to disrupt the process of trying to fix my problem.
Does anyone have any suggestions?
Thanks
llama.cpp
- idk why there's so many llama versions to install on yay
- i went with llama.cpp-bin, because it was built with libcurl and the first one i tried apparently was not
- but i had to remove llama.cpp-git-debug from a previous installation
- remember yay -Q | grep ... to check for installed packages
- the cli interface changes; i ended up with --hf-repo ggml-org/qwen2.5... --hf-file qwen25....
- the huggingface.com page probably has the most accurate and up-to-date instructions
- my goal: fast, offline, generalized/automatic autocomplete
- localhost:8080 to access web ui after running llama-server
They're quick notes, and they actually help me problem solve, not disrupt me. I'm casual about it, though. I'm not copying every input and output verbatim. I think the idea is to leave yourself enough breadcrumbs so that you can reproduce, grab screenshots, and copy error messages later when you're not in the zone. Hope this helps.Also, note that I'm most likely to publish a blog post in the following days while the problem is still fresh in my mind. If I wait months or years, it's pretty much doomed to stay in /drafts forever.
For me, a few days might as well be a year in trying to remember :-(
But I still write. I want to read or research some topics myself and consolidate all my readings in a blog post, clarifies few things for me.
1. It tells me structurally what I understood
2. It creates a structure in my mind for that topic that stays a long time
3. Gives me a place to go back when I want to
4. Sometimes explaining a concept is hard and I would like to write and with some pictures it could mean reader understands my depth of knowledge, and it also clarifies my gap in my knowledge.
5. simply writing is a joy.
When I link to my blog entries, here, it isn’t for self-promotion. It’s because the article is relevant to what I’m talking about, and gives anyone that is interested, more info, without burdening others, with prolix prose.
- document them for a future you
- learn to better do technical communication with people which might not be experts on the specific topic (through without feedback this is just so so)
- sometimes to give HR more insight into your skills
which reminds me I wanted to setup a blog for a long while, I originally wanted to have some "fun" with setup, theming etc. but I think I just should start with some default template until I have time to have "fun" with the setup. Then I would at least already write something....
Theoretically the internet would have enabled the long tail, making tiny domain focused niches viable. In practice discovery is the most gamed algorithm in existence. Unless you have the resources and inclination to spend quality time towards useless "SEO" nobody knows you are alive.
But there is one thing that hasn’t been mentioned here yet.
Sometimes I also blog to put something onto the record.
For example, if there’s something really important for me that the company should follow like our open source philosophy.
I blog about it to make sure that people see it and measure us against it. It is basically a way for me to help we stay on our course because we don’t want to break a public record.
If we accept that nobody's going to read it, then the content doesn't have to tell it for the audience. Not the content, nor it's tone or style or anything else. You can use obscure references that only you understand as a shorthand, like words that your family made up when you were small.
That goes double for visuals, which is another reason I use a custom static site. Can't run JS on Medium. I even built out a client-side search and learned a good amount from that too.
Why someone writes a blog is very personal. If, and only if, you are writing a blog for lots of people to read it, then you do need to ask yourself if lots of people are reading your blog, and if not, what you're going to do about it.
There are lots of reasons why someone might keep a blog (as many posters here demonstrate), the simplest being "because they want to".
It's a great feeling knowing that someone, somewhere not only had the same problem you had but you were able to help them solve it.
If you are writing on the Internet there is a good chance that someone will read it someday.
I'm curious if people around here have tips on diminishing friction and how to write better/more easily.
Not sure how to feel about it tbh.
I also write to keep snapshots of my ideas and thought processes, regardless of how nonsensical they may be.
It's a goldmine of course. Personally I find some of his snarkier papers entertaining, but the real value is in seeing how his understanding of CS developed.
> Future you. Your posts become a time capsule of your evolving mind.
Fully agree with that one. My own blog has become a public diary of my hobby and it's great to see what I've been up to and how wrong I was about certain predictions and assumptions, especially about the ones that say that I'm done reworking my home server setup, multiple times.
Surely it would be nice if someone read it, but really it would just be a bonus. It also makes it completely okay that I don't post that often.
I do also like that my linkedin profile can point to a personal website that contains something else than the profile itself.
The one exception was that one time i put some vacation pictures from portland. I dont understand how or why, but that got 10x the hits.
It almost feels like there is an inverse relationship between effort and views.
Regardless, the main reason i write is to try and sharpen my writing skills, something i feel like i was weak at historically. It has value in and of itself.
Writing it to my public blog improves my writing skills and sometimes helps others with the same problem which is a great plus.
Someone hit my buymeacoffee link a couple months ago, so someone definitely reads my blog. How many? No idea. My only "analytics" are nginx logs.
You blog to write.
You write to explore and develop your thoughts ideas and feelings.
You write publicly because you appreciate others who you found doing the same
Where are the interesting, technical blog posts that nobody is reading? Are they being posted to HN? Someone please point me to them.
I'm nobody, and I'm in there because I wrote a lot for a popular open source project I was involved with a decade ago.
Who knows if it'll be good or bad, but if you put stuff out there or do something notable, you're in the AI weights.
Once it's written down, I might as well put it online, and it has the added advantages that I can simply link to the material rather than having to explain it over and over again e.g. in emails.
This website is place where I put some random notes.
It mostly serves to remind my future self of how I configured or solved things in the past, though it may occasionally be useful to others as well.One very important thing for me is to stop the tool from distracting myself from writing. I write simple markdown files that I then publish, there is nothing that I need to do that distracts me from writing (I still get distracted, but at least not by my blog). The writing is the main task, the publishing and everything around is tiny, so I can focus on what I want to do with my blog. Write.
(Just to get back to the point, choose whatever is easy to set up and easy to maintain and if you realize that the tool is not right for you just change it. (This of course works best when you use your own domain))
also the simple design of the website makes it great
And there's profound credibility in documenting our uncertainties, our revisions, our gradual approximations toward truth.
Do people read them ? I doubt it, maybe 1 or two once in a while. But as the article said there are other reasons to maintain a blog.
If you are the author of one of these or similar blogs: thank you, and please keep posting.
HTTPS://www.abortretry.fail
Definitely made me respect the bloggers I read even more.
Blog especially if no one reads it so that can learn how to blog so that people will read it!
"What a gift to give us to see ourselves as others see us?" -- Robert Burns.
(I have not read all the comments yet, only a few, maybe someone has already said this.)
obviously you can do that on your own computer too, but with an online blog, you can read it from anywhere, on any usable device, with an internet connection.
you can read your own thoughts or code or whatever from 10 years or more ago.
and you can keep your blog private to yourself if you want, on those blogging platforms that support that.
And if anyone else benefits is a bonus.
Over time you’ll get better and it could help a lot more people.
I humbly share my thoughts from around ~4 years ago on the same subject. It is all too easy to focus on outcome/results rather than the joy of the process.
About 5 years later my site had been forgotten, and a company in the UK offered me US$10,000 for use of my schematics and source code.
I was floored. I did ZERO advertising. I was blogging because honestly: I wanted intellectual validation because everyone I admired was blogging and I wanted people to think I was smart, too (I had even joined MENSA that year). I had serious FOMO/esteem problems in my 30's.
Fortunately--somehow--Google connected me with this company through simple search. The company went under, but I got my check for real. My friend at the time was mad at me for not asking 10x that, but so what?
Before ~2010 I stopped blogging and took all my stuff down because I really don't like being known or exposed publicly (I'm still very hard to find on google because someone more famous than me with my name is a top hit!), and I outgrew the FOMO. It doesn't seem to matter anymore because I'm so old: at my level the contacts I developed over three decades matter more than blogs. But it was pretty cool to get an email out of the blue with money attached!
or rather
“Chop wood, carry water and submit your blog to hacker news using a throwaway account.”
? ;)
I see a lot of people (I'm looking at you, pg) that go on at length about how important it is to be precise, plain-spoken, come to a point clearly and then move on.
Sure, when you've reached the point you have nothing new to say, regurgitate it, chew it up good again, think it over, make an insightful, pithy, extremely useful and precise essay.
Congrats. You've now reached AI/LLM status of intelligence. Nothing wrong with that, of course, many times society needs the same point made over and over again in different words until they finally take effect. But the real meat of essay writing is thrashing about semantically until you finally reach a conclusion that you probably knew to some degree all along but didn't really understand all the implications. That means your essays should be thoughtful, researched, messy, creative, self-contradictory, etc.
Guess what? Nobody wants to read that stuff. They all want 2-minute videos on how to lead a meaningful life. I get it: life's short. But you can consume pithy, terse, useful fact-bombs all your life and not know a damned thing aside from how to parrot back others. Writing for others is fine. You might make a difference. Good luck. But if you're not creating refining, and recasting content that nobody reads? You're not getting any personal value from it. Don't expect to write for others and actually make yourself a better person. Most of the time you end up becoming a popular grifter (and this time I'm most definitely talking about pg).
Decide whether you want an audience or not. Unless you're truly that one-in-a-million person with tremendous important insight, I recommend against it. Still, for your own good, please write.
tl;dr - The author presents multiple ways to find a reason for completing work when you're missing a reason. I've found, though, that enjoying the act of writing itself is more meaningful for me. The completed works are incidental and not the end goal that makes it worthwhile. So I'd argue that you should blog because you enjoy writing the blog. If you don't enjoy it, no amount of readership will be worthwhile.
That was very disappointing, to say the least!
I didn't take the C-19 vaccine. I don't remember exactly why. For that I have a blog post I can go to and refresh my memory.
My blog is my journal, but in a fancy format which makes it harder to be forgotten in a park or in a bus trip.
the globalized space of the internet is detrimental to cultures, so it needs to be beheaded. local search engines for every country!
* It'll eventually be scraped into an AI and my factual stuff being in there is good
* It might help some random person who finds it
* Maybe my friends will read it
* Maybe my kids will read it when I die (and if I die prematurely they'll be able to form a shape of what their father is like)
* Simply observing things is worthwhile to me
It's not a brand building exercise or anything. In fact, I doubt very many non-bots visit my blog. Cloudflare reports 11k uniques/month but I think it's all bots. Also, in many cases it's notes for myself for the future. I have mine as a wiki, and I post blog stuff under the blog/ prefix.
My wife and I are expecting a baby in a month or so and I've been chronicling what the process of pregnancy was like. I sometimes just wanted a "here's one path through it" to just get an idea of how this goes and found that hard. Most people write a lot of advice but I wanted to just chronicle the actual experience https://wiki.roshangeorge.dev/index.php/Pregnancy
Even though my wife and I have an unusual one (IVF with genetic embryo selection) maybe something in there will be useful through an LLM.
Another one of the things it appears I'm at 99th percentile or higher at is getting facts into Wikipedia that other people have trouble doing. So sometimes I like to write about my experience doing that https://wiki.roshangeorge.dev/index.php/Blog/2024-10-17/Path...
One of the other last reasons for me to write a blog is that it's just sometimes so beautiful to read someone's human expression of personality and if I'm lucky someone who feels that way can read mine. A Hacker News Comment (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40650982) about a deleted Wikipedia page pointed me to an old mathematician's site and it's such a heartwarming and bittersweet feeling reading his joy and sadness: https://www.math.sci.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/m-mat/AKECHI/index.ht... but even Time Cube counts!
Yeah, I did manage to rescue that Wikipedia article too. Made me happy :)