> “the value would be mostly erased” implies that the price goes down to 0
No, it means the value would be much much closer to 0 than it is now. That’s why I said “mostly erased” and not “entirely erased”
> Gold wouldnt survive your doomsday scenario either
Yes it would… if the internet goes down, gold will still “survive.”
It’s not going anywhere…
> if youre going that far to find the fault in bitcoin then you will also have to concede that your gold is just going to be a metal
“a metal” has inherent value as a material. A record in a digital ledger does not…
> worthless in a scenario where guns and bullets mean holding power, no matter how pretty it looks or which technologies depend on it.
You say that, but historically gold was valuable even though technology didn’t depend on it and even though guns existed. Even before that, actually.
It’s strange that I need to explain that…