Text is scaled to 300% to indicate just how important and authoritative they think their opinion is.
And it talks down to you in a "here comes the expert" style, with an atrocious aimed-at-preschoolers presentation.
No thank you.
Some people do like big bullet list of points.
Some people need to be spoon fed.
Don't blame the spoon for being a spoon.
Quite literally anyone with a bit of persistence could become a professor (and this by far isn't even a top university either).
They are quite literally just a somebody with an opinion just like anybody else. An opinion barked down to you with 300% scaled fonts and preschooler illustrations.
While we shouldn't trust academics just because they are academics, these people specialize in relevant fields and also back their claims with citations throughout the course. They are not just postulating.
I'll gladly defer to their expert opinion on those topics, but IMO to use such an authoritative voice when they are not experts in actual AI systems. Judging the massive progress in the field of AI, how can anyone even remotely state what these systems inherently are, when they are still so new and ever-evolving?