ZeroTier does not use an OSI approved open-source license. It is under a freedom-restricting "Business Source License". Nebula is MIT licensed.
Nebula is much simpler and in most cases faster than ZeroTier.
ZeroTier does not use an OSI approved open-source license. It is under a freedom-restricting "Business Source License". Nebula is MIT licensed.
Nebula is much simpler and in most cases faster than ZeroTier.
Unlike Nebula, it gives you an IPv6 address (actually, millions of them per node, if needed).
They now also have a userspace only SOCKS 5 proxy server that can connect your app to the whole network without forcing user to install drivers or to mess with their network configuration.
The last time I tried ZeroTier (years ago, I admit) it wasn't possible to self-host all of it I think and I couldn't make it reliably use my own relays for good performance of non-direct connections.
I've been happily using Nebula for a while now, pretty easy to configure and self-host.
Do they route announcements over the network? Can I just setup two machines and expect them to just work by finding each other?
Does it support name resolution?
EDIT: actually, they just use various I/O abstractions that WireGuard developed.
Nebula uses Elliptic-curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH) key exchange and AES-256-GCM in its default configuration.
nebula (master)> git rev-parse HEAD
2b427a7e8934f0a436fea25eb40a6b979b34ee7a
nebula (master)> rg --glob '*.go' -i wireguard
wintun/tun.go
6: * Copyright (C) 2018-2021 WireGuard LLC. All Rights Reserved.
9://NOTE: This file was forked from https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-go/tree/tun/tun_windows.go?id=851efb1bb65555e0f765a3361c8eb5ac47435b19
udp/udp_rio_windows.go
4:// Inspired by https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-go/tree/conn/bind_windows.go
25: "golang.zx2c4.com/wireguard/conn/winrio"
overlay/tun_wintun_windows.go
17: "golang.zx2c4.com/wireguard/windows/tunnel/winipcfg"
wintun/device.go
6: * Copyright (C) 2017-2021 WireGuard LLC. All Rights Reserved.
9://NOTE: this file was forked from https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-go/tree/tun/tun.go?id=851efb1bb65555e0f765a3361c8eb5ac47435b19I have tried Tailscale / Headscale and did not find the overhead worth it. Both can saturate a 10Gbps link and that's all I need right now. Nebula's much simpler to administer. The configuration's spelled out in the client configs and in the certificates you provision. If you're already using some form of configuration management, it's quite easy to make changes. If you require a Web UI, Tailscale / Zerotier / etc may be better. There is a company that provides a Nebula-based service with a Web UI but I haven't tried it.
I'd characterize it as such: Wireguard is more of a plumbing solution that gives you a point-to-point connection, either it's enough for you or you can use this to build what you need.
Nebula is more of an end-user ready-to-use solution, gives you features like NAT traversal, automatic selection of direction connections if possible, the nodes don't need to know other nodes' addresses ahead of time(x) etc.
(x) except for the lighthouse