While some countries look at land like the Falklands, or Ukraine, or Taiwan, or Greenland, and think "That's Mine", Britain doesn't do that (any more), and instead says "it's upto you"
While some countries look at land like the Falklands, or Ukraine, or Taiwan, or Greenland, and think "That's Mine", Britain doesn't do that (any more), and instead says "it's upto you"
That being said, if Argentina had not invaded then no-one in Britain would care one way or the other (government could have handed the Islands to Argentina in whatever deal and most people in the UK would just have shrugged it off). It has become a point of principle and pride since the invasion to tell "the Argies" that they can stuff it.
So calling them "people living there", or "settlers" or "inhabitants" or "a democracy" is nothing short of disingenuous.
Maybe they can move to Falklands, then. Because it was empty and had no natives...
A planted and subsidized military operation half the world away doesn't magically become "a society" b/c they look like that on the surface.
After Argentina did a Russia and decided they wanted the people who had lived there for generations to leave, the UK added a military presence.
I'll be waiting here.
I can't tell if the second part of your comment is trolling, or really not knowing the history of the UK before 10 years ago.