;)
;)
I don't think what the iphone supports will matter much in the long run, it's what devices like these nokias that will have the biggest impact on the future of mobile http://www.nokia.com/A4405104
———
No one is going to stop developing in Flash or Java just because it doesn't work on iPhone. Those who wanna cater to the iPhone market will make a "watered down version" of the app. Just the way an m site is developed for mobile browser.Thats it.
——
If another device maker come up with a cheaper phone with a more powerful browser, with support for Java and Flash, things will change. Always, the fittest will survive. Flash and java are necessary evils(if you think they are evil).
——
So it will take 1 (one) must-have application written in Flash or Java to make iPhone buyers look like fools? Sounds okay to me.
——
The computer based market will remain vastly larger than the phone based market. I don't have real numbers off hand, but lets assume 5% of web views are via cellphones
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33083
I mean it had more space than the Nomad and wireless. What else could he have wanted?
---
> What marketshare do you think iphone needs to make such an impact?
5%
> And why do you think it will gain that huge marketshare?
Because of iPod (because iPod already has quite a bit of market share).
> Its the first "nice looking internet in your pocket". But is that enough to take over the mobile world?
Actually, iPhone is much more than just that.
> First Mover = guaranteed success?
No, of course being first mover does not alone guarantee success.
---
Then again, pg was wrong is his main point that either Flash or Microsoft's Silverlight would take over the world.
This was already wrong when he said it to me (I was pitching a mobile question answering system developed in 2004), as then an ugly HTML cousin called WAP already existed. I have never taken any risk capital investor that did not have their own tech exist seriously since then.
I did re-read that section again 25 years later...
Imagine if you don't learn anything new in the next 25 years, and all your opinions stay completely stagnant. What a waste of 25 years that will be.
I mean, here's a piece of mine from 25 years ago.
https://archive.org/details/PersonalComputerWorldMagazine/PC...
I stand by that.
But I wrote things for the Register when I started there full-time 3.3 years ago that now I look at with some regret. I'm learning. I'm changing.
We all learn and we all change. That is good. When you stop changing, you are dead.
Don't be worried about changing your mind. Be worried about if you stop doing so.
I already click on reddit search results less after hitting now-dead search results a bunch of times.
That's less views and less mindshare.
I remember when the first iPhone was released in Jan 2007 that Jobs said all the non-Apple apps would be HTML based.
I thought it was dumb. Release a development environment and there will be thousands of apps that do stuff they couldn't even think of.
The App Store was started in July 2008.
I find it an interesting question to ponder what we consider worthwhile retaining for more than 2000 years (from my personal library, perhaps just the Bible, TAOCP, SICP, GEB and Feynman's physics lectures and some Bach organ scores).
EDIT: PS: Among the things "Show HN" has not yet seen is a RasPi based parchment printer...
The husk of slashdot is still around.