Some of the HN threads:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20421948
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19871989
Edit: removed speculation if consequences of privacy loss, but come on … that’s still pretty serious.
Some of the HN threads:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20421948
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19871989
Edit: removed speculation if consequences of privacy loss, but come on … that’s still pretty serious.
Got any more info on this? Seems like an absurd exaggeration.
Toss in another 150+ human rights activist murders per year, dozens of whistleblowers, 60+ transgender people, and any number of other at-risk groups who tend to rely on technical measures to preserve their privacy and safety abroad.
Did that info being leaked definitely get them killed? No clue. Did it "probably [get] people killed"? I don't know how those people are typically uncovered, so it's hard to say if a few privacy extensions actually mattered. It doesn't seem like an outlandish claim though (and with a prior that those extensions do matter, it's a likely claim).
We didn't think that the intermediate CA expiring would break the signatures, because code signing generally doesn't care about expiration, but we never tested the code path until the intermediate expired and the signatures broke. That was a hard lesson to learn...