Ketamine for Depression: How It Works (2024) [video]
yalemedicine.org
yalemedicine.org
TMS seemed to be pretty effective for me. It feels incredibly silly to have your brain zapped and is a big time commitment (30 days, 1X a day for 10 minutes) but I can't argue with the results.
Ketamine was something else. I did it intravenously, which seemed to be the best way to manage dosage but required going into a clinic. The biggest downside to the whole treatment is that you'll be very drowsy and sometimes down after, and all I wanted to do was go to bed. Taking the Uber home is not pleasant. The esketamine nasal sprays allow you to do it at home at lower dosages.
Once you get over the feeling of leaving your body, it can be quite nice. Overall, it led to unblocking some life time hold ups I had, and made me a better person. I had 5 sessions, 4 of them were overwhelmingly positive. The last was a dark couple hours where I hyperfocused on all my internal fears and failures. It also led to a lot of existential thoughts and questioning the fabric of reality which isn't all bad in small doses. I can see how excessive use could start to be counterproductive, it's good to stay connected to this reality. I don't understand how people use this as a party drug.
I would absolutely recommend it in a controlled setting for limited treatment, but would caution those with addictive personalities to be careful, not to see it as a silver bullet or a crutch, to make sure you're in a neutral mental space and that you're comfortable wherever you're doing it. In tandem, I listened to a fair amount of buddhist podcasts from Joseph Goldstein that helped build out the spiritual/learning side.
I'd like to see psylocibin treatment be more readily available at a lower price across the nation as an alternative.
That's a completely ridiculous price, about 300-500 times the "street" price of shrooms. In countries that I have familiarity with (not USA), shrooms have always been "technically illegal" drug which law enforcement never actually actively enforced, either formally through procedure (with doses below 100 grams considered fine-only territory), or informally, because the cops just don't take it seriously.
So to me it seems like you're choosing to follow the law even though it would not hurt anyone and you would not get into any trouble, just out of pure principle. That's actually quite impressive.
I'm not going to argue that the exact rates are justified, but chances are the person you're replying to was referring to psilocybin assisted therapy in clinical settings. So someone would be signing up to pay for having at least one therapist oversee the process, if not physicians and other staff as well. Factor in their time, operating costs, insurance, etc. it shouldn't be a surprise that the legal option will cost considerably more than buying mushrooms in a paper bag :)
You know, when they talk about "set and setting", that's exactly what they DON'T have in mind.
Even if you’re not a goody goody by nature, the rational behavior for a green card holder at a nuclear lab is to be good as gold, at high cost.
$3,500 seems like they are catering towards an upper class customer with some kind of premium session. I am certain there would be many in Oregon of all places willing to play shaman for much less. The price of shrooms is not the cost though. How much would you need to get paid to trip sit a stranger for 5-6 hours? I am doing nothing this afternoon and $200 an hour doesn't sound worth it if someone offered $1200 right now. That is a lot to deal with. $3,500 is therapy session with a licensed therapist who is going to be very specialized.
Having now been very frustrated, I did actually follow up and organized my own session through my network. I found a contact who worked in psychedelic research, and who had led sessions with others with psilocybin, had a couple friends join and rented an amazing AirBNB in the woods, and was ready for a night of exploration. The chocolate bars the provider gave us... didn't work. I was left with an upset stomach and nausea, without any of the benefits. Our provider was really into psytrance as well, which if you've never listened to is an acquired taste. They were understanding about it all, but suffice it to say I haven't attempted anything since.
It's very easy. You cut up vegetables, put them in salt water and let them ferment for a few days to a week. Fermented carrots are really good. I also absolutely love greens fermented in rice water with a little sugar. There are many recipes online, also for lightly fermenting fruit.
Anyway there is pretty strong research on the connection between gut microflora and depression.
Probiotic fermented foods (especially high fiber fermented foods) are a wonder.
There are, and when I search I am overwhelmed by blog spam that does not describe it as simply as you. For those curious like me, can you point to a good resource? Or explain to salt water and ferment part - leave in a sealed jar on the counter? Thanks in advance
Sandor Katz: Wild Fermentaion
The Noma Guide to Fermentation
but really it can be as simple as some saltwater and veg in a jar, careful to have then mostly covered with brine. Have to manage releasing pressure, burping it a few times a day is fine. Of course, you can get much fancier if you want, the possibilities are endless.
I would at least go slightly fancier: get a lid intended for fermentation that lets gasses out on its own. There are several good designs out there, and your local Target or similar store probably carries a little kit, intended for use with a mason jar, that contains a high quality fermentation lid and a nice stainless steel or glass mechanism to hold your veggies down, for a few dollars.
You will want a lid anyway, and the coated metal two-part lids used for canning jam will be destroyed pretty quickly by regular use for fermentation.
- 3 tablespoons salt to 4 cups non chlorinated water. (for greens I boil a handful of rice in water, discard the rice, add a teaspoon or so of sugar and use that water w/ same salt ratio).
- Cut up the veggies and pack them in a jar. No thick pieces (like a whole carrot is too thick, a carrot stick like your mom may have given you as a child is fine).
- Put a weight on top of the veggies to keep them submerged. A ziplock bag partially filled with water works or they sell special weights and spring loaded jar tops for this.
- Don't seal the jar, gas will be produced. Cover it with a cloth if you like although usually the baggie weight is covered enough.
- Leave it room temperature for about a week. 4-5 days is usually enough but longer produces a more sour taste. I've gone 2 weeks plus no problem.
Put it in the fridge (drain some water if you like), keep it sealed (no air) and that is it. It's pretty simple at the end of the day. Some people weigh things and add 2% salt by weight of veggies/water and there are other methods, but what I listed is how I do it and it works. Key is to keep veggies submerged.
Having a regular quantity of fermented foods as part of my diet has a noticeable effect.
Fermented foods are worth trying out, but your milage might vary.
I notice a very strong correlation. Fermented high fiber "living" food and avoiding all preservatives really improves my outlook on life but yep, your mileage may vary.
Easy and cheap enough to try though.
There are only about 200 cases per year of botulism in the US and most of it is infants (about 70% of the ~200 cases).
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-jBoSEVlryiX1IaSzV4vKuih...
Drugs that affect the serotonine system can do this. Burnout from (repeated) overload sort of situation IIUC.
I’m no doctor, but I suspect it’s extra dangerous if you’re already suffering depression.
I couldn’t read the whole note. What a tragedy :'(
Of course, many people still do it. But they are fully aware of what road they're taking.
I suspect even 15 years on I haven’t fully regained my ability to experience joy, but this is impossible to know for sure. I can’t run the counter factual and there are many other variables at play. I was a teenager when I got too deep into MDMA.
("sure, it's your choice what you put in your body, but a really enlightened person wouldn't be so frightened and closed-minded that they don't want to see what psychedelics can show them...")
of course ketamine for depression has this giant downside risk of adverse effects and psychosis, and we should talk about it more, not just sell it as a safe miracle drug.
however... safe, neutral, bland, boring well-tolerated SSRIs, also have a massive downside risk, in that they can trigger a manic episode, which in severe cases also involves psychosis.
so i find myself in the position of being glad there are different depression treatments for different people, including psychedelics and dissociatives, and hopefully we can find a way to make sure people get sorted to the treatments where they are least exposed to the tail risk side effects.
I'm sorry WHAT? I've been to many open airs and other events where MOST of the people around have been under the effect of psychedelic and in other drug-friendly places, and I have never hear manipulative shit like that ever. On the contrary, if I heard people talk about this drugs it was always "it worked for me but might be a bad experience for you", "be safe, don't take it if you're not sure" and "you can always have a great time here completely sober".
when i talk about psychedelic advocates, i mean the people who think that widespread use of psychedelic drugs would massively improve mental health, make people more productive and happier, etc.
As a point of comparison: "social drinking advocates" vs. those who like to get blackout drunk every night.
The idea that everyone should be pressured into taking psychedelics is an absurd extreme. Psychedelics can be a powerful catalyst to growing as a person, but they're not a magic potion that makes you grow emotionally, spiritually, and intellectually.
They're likely going to bring your unprocessed ideas and personal issues to the forefront which can be very productive if you want to face them. But those who carry around demons that they've repressed and absolutely don't want to face would probably have a terrible time on psychedelics.
There are countless heartbreaking stories of people who were prescribed these drugs not knowing what they were subscribing to. In many cases, the effects of those drugs are worse than the symptoms they are supposed to alleviate. With "I Don't Wanna Be Me" there's even a song by Type O Negative (from Peter Steele's own experience with Prozac) about the devastating effects SSRIs can have on a person's life.
These drugs are handed out like candy while the physicians prescribing them often point-blank deny any side effects or even attribute those to the illness they are meant to treat.
Psychedelics, on the other hand, have actually been proven to be effective for many syndromes SSRIs are commonly used for and by comparison are very safe when used with proper preparation, medical surveillance, and in the right setting.
The only reason psychedelics are still widely shunned is a Puritan attitude to human well-being: You're not supposed to feel better than the common neutral base level. Any drugs achieving that (alongside with other, more specific and intended medical effects) are maligned and ostracized.
However, the prevalence of side effects with psychedelics is in the single-digit range, whereas with SSRIs you're almost certain to be experiencing some sort of - often severe - side effects for the rest of your life.
so it's good we have all options, but ideally we'd have a better way of judging who is safest with which treatment.
- sexual dysfunction
- loss of emotion and creativity
- drowsiness
- insomnia (including real fun stuff like night terrors)
- fatigue
- nausea
- tremors
I'd hardly call that safe or manageable.
With even the most potent psychedelics such as LSD, on the other hand, there's merely a one in thousand chance for severe side effects.
I'd go as far as prohibiting the prescription of SSRIs for all but the most severe cases (such as a severe depression where the patient is actually suicidal). For everything else these drugs are commonly used for, e.g., mild depression, OCD, or IBS, there are other - in many cases better - options with far less devastating (if any) adverse effects.
Almost none of these would be permanent, and you certainly don't have a 1 in 3 chance of them being permanent. Where did you get that number?
> With even the most potent psychedelics such as LSD, on the other hand, there's merely a one in thousand chance for severe side effects.
This is fucking nuts. We're in a thread about how taking too much can clearly cause weeks of psychosis, and how easy it is to do that. There's nothing wrong with warning about the risks of SSRIs, but to claim you have a 1 in 3 chance of having permanent nausea while, in the same breath, claiming psychedelics are 100x safer, is beyond irresponsible.
Sexual dysfunction caused by SSRIs in many cases persists for the rest of the patient's life.
> and you certainly don't have a 1 in 3 chance of them being permanent. Where did you get that number?
Those are actual numbers from scientific studies: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2719451/
> in the same breath, claiming psychedelics are 100x safer, is beyond irresponsible.
Stating mere facts isn't irresponsible and those are the facts:
When taking SSRIs you have a one in three chance to permanently and severely change your life for the worse.
When taking LSD you have a 1 in 1,000 chance of suffering a psychotic break.
What's irresponsible - and unethical - is twisting and misrepresenting these facts - to the extent of outright lying about the purported innocuousness of SSRI, as is wont in the psychiatric community.
You said most symptoms were permanent, don't back down now. Sexual Dysfunction is a pretty broad term, how would you even link it to being affected by an SSRI?
> Those are actual numbers from scientific studies: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2719451/
Literally says NOTHING about being permanent, this is about symptoms experienced while on SSRIs. Did you read your own source?
> When taking LSD you have a 1 in 1,000 chance of suffering a psychotic break
Where are you getting this number? It lacks so much context. What dosage gives you a 1/1000 chances of a psychotic break? Are you aware people are just taking whatever amount of Ketamine they feel like?
You seem to be arguing that Ketamine is somehow 300+ times safer than SSRIs as if you can compare the two 1:1. That is now how medication works.
There you go: https://www.tga.gov.au/news/safety-updates/updated-warnings-...
https://annals-general-psychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles...
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8061302/
https://rxisk.org/post-ssri-sexual-dysfunction-pssd/
> Where are you getting this number?
There you go (for instance): "Cohen suggests a low rate of prolonged psychotic reactions in LSD users (1.8 per 1000) [19]"
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41380-024-02800-5#Sec35
> Are you aware people are just taking whatever amount of Ketamine they feel like?
Ketamine is a totally different type of drug. Deriving anything about psychedelics from the amount of Ketamine people take is entirely nonsensical.
With regards to Ketamine.
> There you go (for instance): "Cohen suggests a low rate of prolonged psychotic reactions in LSD users (1.8 per 1000) [19]"
That is a description of one of the many studies included in this meta-analysis. This is from the same article.
> Taken together, the effective risk of psychedelic-induced psychosis or worsening of pre-existing psychotic symptoms in schizophrenia -as well as in the early stages of the psychosis spectrum- remains incompletely understood
Also
> Overall quality of studies was low and only few studies (n = 9) could be included in the meta-analysis, hence the presented findings should be interpreted with caution.
You're doing something called "Moving the goalposts" by first asking for sources and then complaining because those sources don't support the very narrow construal you seem to be applying to my argument.
Those sources are scientific studies, which by the very nature of the scientific processes of course are open-ended.
no, more complicated than that..
Trusting the process was great and worked well after 4 IV treatments. There is absolutely something to the plasticity coming from a treatment and being able to get out of a rut.
Anecdotes are not data and abuse potential isn’t really relevant to their clinical utility. Do we need to have a comment about junkies whenever someone mentions that they received fentanyl for a major surgery?
I think the hippie stereotype is indicative to how damaging psychedelics have on the mind. You look at these people they are happy but something is clearly wrong.
Schedule 1 substances basically can’t be prescribed without very special circumstances and permission. (Marijuana is in this class in the USA, strangely enough, along with MDMA.)
Even methamphetamine and cocaine aren’t Schedule 1.
Adderall is Schedule 2.
I've wondered if a similar thing can be how much people are affected by things like Virtual Reality. After the initial five minute first try I never could get very immersed in VR (more than a regular 2D game). I could never feel any fear of height or anything for instance, it didn't grab me.
I've wondered a while if that is a correlation that spans other people. If the people who get blown away by VR would also have large lasting effects of psychedelics, and vice versa.
Be sure to keep something around to catch any vomit, personally I've almost never not vomited once when it starts to kick in. Have music and media to consume
However, I introduced it to my peer group back then and in college, and there were some that seemed to be slow metabolizers of DXM. Ketamine is shorter in duration and lacks (minimizes) many of the worst aspects of DXM like body nausea/body load.
Since I anticipate some people might go "so what lasting effects did you expect?" I guess I'm thinking more about all the amazing stories you read everywhere about psychedelics. Even in movies and media it's usually presented as something that transforms you in one way or another. I've never quite found that to exist.
Ketamine was very interesting. Proper completely dissociative "K-hole" experience. I feel like it helped with Anxiety, but I can't pinpoint "why" from an introspective perspective.
Psilocybin on the other hand. Was a hero dose, and I'm a changed person afterwards.
Could feel the "layers" of my identity being stripped off, almost regression to a more child-like state. Very interesting experience. Had strong synesthesia: sounds would produce colors, colors would produce tastes, fun experience.
Near the peak of the experience I had these strong recurring auditory hallucination of my mothers says all these random words from my youth, these were accompanied by strong feeling of anxiety. After a lot of post-experience integration and reflection I realized that my mothers anxiety about the world was effectively "programmed" into my brain during my upbringing. e.g. Generationally transmitted anxiety.
Therapy always talks about childhood trauma, etc, but actually experiencing it was another level, and really helped me on my journey to being a less anxious person.
Before the Psilocybin experience, I suffered from existential depression: what's the point of living if the sun is going to explode in ~x billion years. Towards the peak of the experience everything was super chaotic, I felt like I was being transported into different realities (e.g. realities with different laws of physics, or different space time geometries). This was hugely anxiety inducing and would otherwise be called a "bad trip." I felt "lost" in this sea of all different realities.
As I was coming down from the peak and started to reintegrate, I had a strong distinct sense of "coming back" to our current reality. It felt like finding a safe tropical island in a sea of chaos: e.g. our currently reality is a safe space and point of stability in a sea of chaos and uninviting realities.
I was truly, deeply, grateful to be able to return to the familiar and it made me really really deeply appreciate myself and the blessing that our reality is to us.
Post the experience I also acquired the ability to observe my emotions from a third person perspective. e.g. rather than feeling "angry" I could tag the emotion "angry" and react accordingly, almost as if I gained ring 0 access to my brain when I previously only have ring 1 access.
All-in-all probably the most profound and healing experience of my life.
1. Deeply felt and understood my anxiety was generationally passed on from my mother's anxiety,
2. Eliminated my existential depression, giving me a deep appreciation for the beauty of our reality,
3. Gave me ring 0 access to my emotions making me a much more stable, calm person.Someone I'm very close to was also addicted, using it for emotional suppression. They're luckily off of it and in therapy but it can get nasty. Fair warning.
You did it wrong. You need to micro-dose psilocybe shrooms over the course of ~30 days.
This paper suggests as much: “Conversely, chemogenetic activation of ABINs without any change in neuron numbers mimics both the cellular and the behavioral effects of ketamine, indicating that increased activity of ABINs is sufficient for rapid antidepressant effects.”
I wouldn't do Ketamine because I know for a certain type of person, they instantly fall in love with "spiritual heroin". I know almost for certain I am that type of person.
A friend who struggles with depression found it useful for a while, but its effects didn't continue after a number of doses.
I've taken care of multiple ketamie and MDMA overdoses (in the sense of unexpected effects, not just the amount) and they did not have a good time. (I also know plenty of people that had a blast on the combo, my point is: don't recommend drugs or combos easily.)
The main thing to remember is that combining drugs means taking less of each than when you take them by themselves. As always in all drug use: Dosage, dosage, dosage.
Overdose can mean multiple things, the one you’re referring to is the medicinal overdose with danger to health, and what most people are (exclusively) familiar with. An overdose in the psychological sense is anything that exceeds the desired effect. Someone who wanted to party and quietly sits on a log, occasionally vomiting, unable to stand up, afraid to die, is definitely an overdose in the psychological sense, even without medicinal danger (regular breathing, responding to stimuli, effects stable). The transition from »oops this is too much, oh well« to an overdose is a spectrum.
Psychonautwiki is a very good source, but neither it nor scientific literature has a good overview over individual cases. I know I’m at the base of the pyramid of evidence talking about my work on festivals doing psycare, so even if you doubt the stories me, my colleagues and any techno scene paramedic could tell you, the most important point stands: do not recommend drugs or even combinations to people without medical background. (For that, I can give you papers on e.g. people metabolizing MDMA via the MDA route exclusively for dramatically altered effects.)
Drugs for depression get addictive as your body gets instant reward by the pill.
It's sad to see many 1st world countries becoming too dependent of them, instead of achieving happiness and personal goals
Personally, cold exposure + lots of coffee + engaging work w/ others has been more effective than anything I've found in the healthcare system. Commit to daily work/social obligations, then drink enough coffee until you can will yourself to go everyday. Once it starts to become a habit is when my depression (slowly) will start to lift. If I stop for too long I fall back into the hole.
Self-diagnosis is generally frowned upon but I think everyone owes it to themselves to at least try to find explanations that they can discuss with professionals.
i am thinking we will self pay an MRI.
Below the abstract of the mentioned research (BDNF is Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor, a kind of growth hormone for the brain), note the 1000 fold(!) higher affinity of the psychedelics:
Psychedelics produce fast and persistent antidepressant effects and induce neuroplasticity resembling the effects of clinically approved antidepressants. We recently reported that pharmacologically diverse antidepressants, including fluoxetine [= SSRI] and ketamine, act by binding to TrkB, the receptor for BDNF. Here we show that lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) and psilocin directly bind to TrkB with affinities 1,000-fold higher than those for other antidepressants, and that psychedelics and antidepressants bind to distinct but partially overlapping sites within the transmembrane domain of TrkB dimers. The effects of psychedelics on neurotrophic signaling, plasticity and antidepressant-like behavior in mice depend on TrkB binding and promotion of endogenous BDNF signaling but are independent of serotonin 2A receptor (5-HT2A) activation, whereas LSD-induced head twitching is dependent on 5-HT2A and independent of TrkB binding. Our data confirm TrkB as a common primary target for antidepressants and suggest that high-affinity TrkB positive allosteric modulators lacking 5-HT2A activity may retain the antidepressant potential of psychedelics without hallucinogenic effects.