Give Me 30 Minutes, and I Will Kill Your Entrepreneurial Dream
johnroa.substack.com
johnroa.substack.com
I used to work with SCORE, an entrepreneur mentorship program with local chapters. This kind of dissuading tough love was part of the advice that would be given. However, it’d be presented more as homework for the entrepreneur: validate your market, have answers to sales objections, plan to shore up capitalization, have deeper conversations with family that will be supporting you.
Some entrepreneurs did probably need a tougher lecture that suggested nothing would help if they didn’t apply enough raw tenacity and diligence, but many succeeded after smaller changes to their thinking. The 99% failure rate is not accurate when the entrepreneur has a reasonable idea and plan.
I would love for the author to cite their sources on this but I do find it vibes with my experience.
In the tech world, it's not uncommon for founders to attract enough investment to at least pay themselves something before they have any revenue. But in lot of lines of business you can work very hard shouldering massive responsibilities, and take home almost nothing.
Hate to be that guy, but that's not a proof, that's an anecdote, and a convenient one at that.
> Roughly 99% of startups end up going belly-up.
and later
> Roughly 90% of startups fail
I get it, a lot of them fail, but that's a massive difference. The former is a good point, the latter is not so good.
The whole article is sort of like this. Vague claims mixed with "I'm smarter than you for not trying", it's really hard to find a good and strong interpretation of what the author is trying to bring across here.
Hope is sometimes stupid, yeah, but let people try and fail, if they want. That is, after all, how we get the 1% that succeed.
"Grinding won't help you... unless you're so stubborn that you disregard the above warnings and grind so hard you break through to success"?
Seems like this is just another test the author thinks would-be entrepreneurs need to pass, rather than actual advice.
>Seems like this is just another test the author thinks would-be entrepreneurs need to pass, rather than actual advice.
It can be both. It's a decision point - do you accept the toxicity and the extremely long odds in exchange for the potential upside of going from zero to generational wealth in a single IPO or buyout offer? Can you fail ten times and still sleep indoors and eat food or are you betting the rent on your meditation app being different from all the others?
As opposed to the other who was largely self funded, had a start of like 8 people who relied on him, kept getting enticed with exits that fell through, that grinded away at his mental health over multiple years until he went full on right wing conspiracy theorist prepper and moved his family to an off grid homestead.