Concern over even a low possibility of a catastrophic event is hardly alarmist.
And what if your assumption about printing checks is wrong? I find no basis for that assumption, by the way.
And what if your assumption about printing checks is wrong? I find no basis for that assumption, by the way.
There are simply no mechanisms in place to do what you're saying, nor does there appear to be any willingness to correct errors, given the desire to cut spending. Missed payments may be a feature, not a bug.
> Missed payments may be a feature, not a bug.
> not legally, and certainly not in a timely manner.
Bad faith magic wand waving, these arguments do not have substance. People/bots are on a bandwagon against change many have been calling for years for. Our treasury system NEEDS an overhaul and there are much bigger problems with this admin to make an issue out of.