I can't follow the logic.
In the context of remote attestation, they can revoke the key and vulnerability like these won't help.
In the context of remote attestation, they can revoke the key and vulnerability like these won't help.
You're talking about the first order reaction.
The reaction to that reaction is that the noose of remote attestation develops slower. As things currently stand, they can't revoke the attestation keys of all the affected processors with websites (etc) just telling the large numbers of people with with those computers that they need to buy new ones. Rather the technological authoritarians have to continue waiting for a working scheme before they can push the expectation of remote attestation being something that is required.