Meanwhile I work in reproducible builds and remote attestation. We absolutely can and must hold computers accountable, now that we have elected them into positions of power in our society.
Surely the company that is making profit out of said build systems and providing attestations holds some accountability. Someone wrote the code. Someone paid for the code to be written to a particular standard, under particular budget and resourcing constraints. Someone was responsible for ensuring the code was adequately audited. Someone claimed it was fit for purpose, and likely insured it as such, because they are ultimately responsible.
You can only hold computers accountable if you can guarantee no outside modification. We still haven't ever successfully had a system that's not "pop-able" that I am aware of.