I see where the author is going, but I think we need to be realistic that LLMs are taking a cut of where we would normally use a junior dev. the value prop is fairly poor if we expect a junior to leave after 18-24 months and they aren't able to learn enough in a short enough period to get some of the investment back. I'm still all for having junior devs around- I think they provide a LOT of intangible value, but we probably should be realistic about the new world we're heading into.