> Majority of commit messages are low quality and would benefit significantly from a good summary of what was done.
Why? At that point doesn't the diff speak for itself?
Why? At that point doesn't the diff speak for itself?
As you say, we know what’s there. I need the author to tell me why it’s there, and perhaps what other alternatives were abandoned because they didn’t work.
You know, so I don’t waste a day finding out for myself why you didn’t just do ${obvious}.