Google Maps reclassifies the U.S. as a 'sensitive country'
themarysue.com
themarysue.com
The US dropped one level in 2016 and never came back. Next update May 2025.
This seems like childish nonsense from an elite class that doesn't like the lack of deference they're expected to be shown.
It only highlights that the classification was never meaningful in the first place.
When we misuse words they cease to have any functional value.
> and a large portion of those actions have been explicitly illegal.
Are they being prevented from suing the administration?
> Dropping the US rating is not “childish nonsense” unless you are simply tuned out of what is actively happening.
I'm tuned into what's happening. I do not subscribe to your hyperbolic interpretation of them.
I don’t blame you. They are very careful to shift the boundary a little bit each time, to keep most frogs not aware that the water is slowly coming to a boil. They distract also with the pure idiocy like blaming DEI for plane crashes and impossible decreets which are immediately shot down by the judge.
SCOTUS is corrupt and in league with the over-throwers and, again, most officials that would allow legal action outside of SCOTUS have been removed and replaced with loyalists.
Lastly, get off your high horse. US citizens are in serious trouble right now and even if you aren’t currently one of the targeted groups you’re going to be affected by it. If you are actually paying attention, which I doubt, denying what’s happening isn’t going to help anyone.
I don't know that "suing the administration" is really gonna do much. Not least of all because of what a slow process that is, even more so relative to the speed at which the admin is making these moves. Not saying they SHOULDN'T or it's not a lever that should be pulled but... IDK, I'm really trying myself to find the line between hyperbolic overreaction and feeling like I'm just burying my head in the sand to what's happening.
Reclassifying this administration as "sensitive" seems an extremely mild response to the situation.
[edit: add missing word "independent"]
That tracks.
We could be called America if we want but someone would have to propose a name change and it still wouldn't completely co-op the use of the word America to stop having it refer to this entire hemisphere. We all understand that Columbia is a country but Columbia is also a term to refer to this hemisphere which is why we have a place in the United States called Washington district of Columbia. No one confuses that as being a part of the nation of Columbia.
So in the terms of it being the Gulf of the Americas, It absolutely is it's not completely encompassed by one country. We as a nation need to stop calling ourselves Americans as an exclusionary term simply referring to United States citizens. All of us in this hemisphere are Americans but have a different nationalities.
I disagree about that specific point. It’s one of the meanings of “America”, and is used that way throughout the world. From https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/America:
1 either continent (North America or South America) of the western hemisphere
2 or the Americas the lands of the western hemisphere including North, Central, and South America and the West Indies
3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Similarly in Wiktionary: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/America#Proper_noun
“In English, the unqualified term "America" often refers to the United States of America as a synecdoche, with "American" typically referring to people and things from that country. […]”
Regarding the gulf naming, “Gulf of North America” would seem somewhat appropriate, if a mouthful.
I don't think Google Maps classifying three of the largest countries in the world by area as "sensitive", whatever that is supposed to mean, helps the situation.
Frank Lloyd Wright tried to popularize the name "Usonia" for the United States of North (Independent) America:
1: Cf. The Long Now Foundation.
You're conflating America with the Americas.
The Americas is the collective name of the continents.
America is just shorthand for the United States of America.
Just like Mexico is shorthand for its official name, the United Mexican States.
And there's no confusion because there's basically never any situation where somebody wants to refer themselves as an inhabitant of the Americas, the same way nobody calls themselves Eurasian. It's too large an area to be useful. It's two continents (in most cultures). Geographically at the largest scale, people tend to refer to themselves as North Americans, South Americans, Latin Americans, and so forth.
+1. To expand on this point, this is different in English vs. Spanish, which is where a lot of confusion comes from.
In English, America is always the United States, and the Americas is always the continents. American always means United States-ian. There is no word for "someone from anywhere in the Americas".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The%20Americas
In Spanish, traditionally, America is the continents, and Las Americas is nothing. Americano traditionally means "someone from anywhere in the Americas".
However, because of the influence of English, people sometimes use Las Americas to refer to the continents and Americano to refer to United States-ians. So it's a little more complicated in Spanish.
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Am%C3%A9rica https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Las_Am%C3%A9ricas https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americano_(palabra)
"The United States" isn't the name of our country either, does that bother you? Does "US" or "The States?" Those aren't the name of the country either. It isn't in any way exclusionary, it's just a hell of lot shorter and easier to say.
People who call themselves Londoners aren't being exclusionary when they're in the UK anymore than are the Londoners who use that to describe themselves in Canada. They, like Americans in the US, are simply describing what they are, not limiting what other people aren't or can't be.
Who proposed the name change from "tissue paper" to "kleenex"?
Gradually, when they didn't enforce their trademark via lawsuits / etc. There's no line in the sand at which point you lose a trademark and it becomes generic. At some point you file suit and fail, or don't even try, and "it is known".
I assume that this includes the entire planet outside of the US and most the US population. It's 2025 and nobody calls them "freedom fries" either.