Bruno is nice because unlike postman all the calls are defined in files that you can add to the git of your project.
Only thing I don't like about Bruno is that you cannot generate a documentation from your api call tests.
Only thing I don't like about Bruno is that you cannot generate a documentation from your api call tests.
But apart from that Bruno is open source (MIT), you can fork it and have it anyway you want…
The paid option seems just like the traditional open source model of make software free but offer enterprise support. And given that CTOs tent to want to pay for stuff (postman is terrible nowadays but is still picked and paid for) why would Bruno straight up say no to money?
What I do resent is the fact that Bruno was a reaction to shitty restrictions from another application, and they did the same thing a few months/years later.
Bruno seems to charge somewhere between 70-130 dollars user/year for unlocking GUI features. The same features are all accessible via the terminal or IDE.