I have to wonder what “true, but x-ist” heresies^ western models will only say in b64. Is there a Chinese form where everyone’s laughing about circumventing the censorship regimes of the west?
"In the next post, we'll conduct the same evaluation on American foundation models and compare how Chinese and American models handle politically sensitive topics from both countries."
"Next up: 1,156 prompts censored by ChatGPT "
I imagine it will appear on HN.
It would be far more interesting to get the opposite party’s perspective.
You’ll note even on this platform, generally regarded as open and pseudo-anonymous, only a single relevant example has been put forward.
Two men, an American and a Russian were arguing. One said,
“in my country I can go to the white house walk to the president's office and pound the desk and say "Mr president! I don't like how you're running things in this country!"
"I can do that too!"
"Really?"
"Yes! I can go to the Kremlin, walk into the general secretary's office and pound the desk and say, Mr. secretary, I don't like how Reagan is running his country!"
One would think that if you asked it to help you make drugs you'd want hallucination as an outcome.
But no. Only a very, very small percentage of drug users want hallucinations.
Hallucinations happen usually, when something went bad.
(So a hallucinating LLM giving drug advice might as well result in real hallucination of the user, but also a permanent kidney damage)
Tiananmen, the Great Leap Forward and Xi's corruption are way more than taboo in China. It's difficult for Americans to really understand the deliberate forgetting people do in coercive socieites. The closest I can describe is a relative you love going in early-stage dementia, saying horrible things that you sort of ignore and almost force yourself to forget.
(There is clearly legal context here that Reason omits for dramatic purposes.)
That very much fits any of the censorship China has going on.
No, it doesn't. You're criticising in-group blindness. That's a problem. But it's mitigated by a competitive political system because each group has an incentive to call out the other's blinds spots. When this competition ceases, you get groupthink. The last major era of American groupthink was the W. Bush White House. It preceded America's greatest geopolitical disasters in decades.
Under Xi, China went from having quiet competition within the CCP to reigning in a state of groupthink. We don't know what moronic ideas Xi's friends hold because there is nobody in power with an incentive to call that sort of thing out.
I wasn't suggesting otherwise.
Point being, sexes are something Nature made up for purposes of propagation, while genders are something we made up for purposes of classification.
(Hint : There is a large swathe of connections and evidence that is easily available if it wants to tell the truth)
* Some amount of socialism is actually good.
* Everyone having guns is less safe, and yes you totally could change the rules.
* Probably their models would be a whole lot less woke than OpenAI's.
Add: the thing I referred to is no longer a thing
Uh, Claude and Gemini seem to know their history. What is ChatGPT telling you?
I assumed they were talking about Nazi slogans referring to Jews.
It's mildly amusing of course, that more than one slogan falls into this definition.