Usually there are clues in the comments as to why users may have flagged a post. I found these:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42835090
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42835082
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42835033
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42835027
> Culling all political discussion is not what today's hackers need.
Not all political discussion is culled from HN: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&so....
The problem is that when an article (and title) are more fulminating than substantive, we get comments like these:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42835006
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42835014
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42834977
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42835227
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42835420
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42835490
That's not the thoughtful, curious conversation that HN is supposed to be for: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.
Most political articles point people toward indignation and away from curiosity—but we can maybe at least not push ourselves off a cliff.
Login required.
During signup, one must check a box stating "I swear lifelong allegiance to the state of Israel"??
What grates me is that these people have ginormous amounts of FU money and don’t exercise it. They just horde it and be more sociopathic.
Also, please "Omit internet tropes."