It may be more than one war.
https://therecord.media/philippines-arrests-chinese-nationa-...
Economy will not collapse while China (and other “neutral” countries) supports it.
Even if they rolled through Kiev with tanks tomorrow, the future for the typical Russian looks bleak.
(My prediction is that just like other countries with bad demographics, Russia will require mass-immigration in the near future to avoid collapse. This will dilute their national identity, weaken central control, cause internal strife, etc… Also, if you’re a poor Asian worker looking for a country to move to, would you rather choose South Korea or rural Russia?)
It is not that they are winning territory, they gain power over EU.
If they win, EU politically will be destroyed as half of Europe will seek protection by agreeing to whoever promise it, while US withdrawing from all its obligations.
It is really may be a new order when everyone is on themselves.
I think all the statements that the EU "is freeloading" on the US are not factual. The US spends more than the EU because it has a nuclear arsenal (forbidden for many EU countries) and regularly engages in hegemonic wars like in the second Iraq war or in Afghanistan.
If the US withdraws its forces from the EU, Poland alone could stop a Russian invasion, not to mention a two front war with Finland involved.
I blame the EU politicians for not responding with more confidence and concrete examples like the above to Trump's recent statements. Trump has no cards to play. If he leaves, good riddance. If he threatens 50% tariffs, block Google, Meta, Amazon, X and Tesla. This is the language he understands.
There is no guarantee that part of the EU will decide not to block any joint military action for either fear of retaliation from russia or because of separate peace agreements with it.
You can see that right now US incites division in multiple ways: Musk in Germany, Republicans in UK, Trump in Denmark.
These are all coordinated attacks with the same strategic goals.
The Polish "elite" has portfolio of real estates located from Spain to Dubai. The Russian invasion would be meatgrinder of youngish non rich male population as in Ukraine.
But they are. Germany's Minister of Defence recently admitted that Bundeswehr is in such sorry state that "pretty much anyone could defeat it". They have tanks, but those tanks are not even operational, because they are not maintained. Same goes for other types of equipment, and other EU countries.
War in Ukraine was a wake-up call, but it will take at least a decade for EU to be able to defend themselves without US help.
https://www.heritage.org/defense/commentary/2024-the-us-mili...
Germany has a higher budget than Poland. Apparently Poland is able to keep 1000 tanks operational. Germany/von der Leyen made the mistake to use McKinsey as consultants for the army. McKinsey can leave Germany, too.
2020 'during a recent military exercise all 18 Pumas deployed suffered technical failures' https://thehill.com/homenews/ap/ap-technology/ap-german-mili...
There is high failure rate and there is just broken but nobody noticed because we never use them despite owning 350 and ordering next 200 batch. https://www.dw.com/en/puma-tanks-unusable-is-germanys-milita...
Polish army is nepotist institution with budget being spent on things like 40 years old retirees. Any equipment numbers reported by them to be multiplied by 0.6 or even 0.4.
We did have close to 750 operational tanks before 2022, but I think around 300 of them were given to Ukraine when the war started. We are now slowly replacing them with M1 Abrams and Korean's K2.
All of the countries formerly occupied by Russia are seeking protection from Russia. There's no scenario where they'd turn toward it for protection, no matter whether US withdraws from European obligations.
Oil and gas are the last thing that comes to mind when thinking about resources of that region. Coal, agriculture, manufacturing…
> Their military will be so degraded
Russian army is currently stronger than before the war. There’s ongoing purge in ministry of defense to clean the ranks from corruption, they learned a lot and invested a lot in military industrial complex. The casualties are high, mostly among fresh recruits, but also a lot of professional military personnel got plenty of experience. It will be wrong to dismiss it.
> that they might face a series of rebellions in their border regions in the next decade
Absolutely not. Situation in politics is very stable now and there’s no path leading to such destabilization.
>Also, if you’re a poor Asian worker looking for a country to move to, would you rather choose South Korea or rural Russia?
Central Asian workers did well and will be fine in construction, hospitality and few other sectors in Russia where they historically filled significant numbers of jobs. They are scared now, but as the war ends, incentive to return will be high. Biggest Russian advantage here over South Korea is cultural proximity, shared language and established travel routes.
Coal usage is levelling off and might even start going backwards over the next decade: https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/global-coal-c...
You can't farm in soil that's filled with landmines, unexploded ordinance, and various shrapnel metals. Just ask how productive the fields of Verdun are.
Ukraine wasn't exactly a manufacturing powerhouse before the war, and Russia nearly levelled a big chunk of it, such as the Azovstal steel plant.
> Russian army is currently stronger than before the war.
Have you not watched /r/combatfootage recently? They're doing suicide-runs with golf buggies. They've completely run out of entire categories of armoured vehicles. They might have more meat left for the grinder, but they're forced to buy shells from North Korea!
> It will be wrong to dismiss it.
Oh sure, they retain a lot of strength on paper, but we've all seen what that paper is worth over the last three days... err... years.
> very stable now and there’s no path leading to such destabilization.
“How did you go bankrupt?” The other responds, “Two ways. Gradually, then suddenly.”
> They are scared now
"Everything is fine" != "They are scared".
> incentive to return will be high
What incentive? The Ruble is going to lose a lot of its value when the Russian government can no longer afford to artificially prop it up. People don't like being paid in turnips and promises.
> South Korea is cultural proximity, shared language and established travel routes.
Sure, maybe, but would you rather work in an air-conditioned robotics factory that looks like a clean-room and getting paid in hard currency or cutting lumber in Siberia and getting paid in Rubles?
Coal is phased out as energy source, but it is used in steel production. There's some local demand for it, but nevermind, you are right, economically it may be already irrelevant. My point was, your mentioning of oil and gas was not based on the knowledge of economic geography of this region.
>Ukraine wasn't exactly a manufacturing powerhouse before the war, and Russia nearly levelled a big chunk of it, such as the Azovstal steel plant.
Speaking of which, you are certainly not aware that there's a property boom in Mariupol right now, thanks to 2% mortgages subsidized by government (that's basically free money). In peaceful times it will be incredibly attractive for investment for many reasons. Reconstruction jobs will last for a while and the example outcome of such spending you can see in the skyline of modern Grozny. It's more likely than in Chechnya that the economy of this region may actually produce some surplus within 10-15 years due to a different governance model. In Ukraine it would be an economic powerhouse too, but it is wrong to think that Russia has ruined it forever.
>Just ask how productive the fields of Verdun are.
There's nothing even remotely comparable to Verdun in Ukraine. The same region was a battlefield in WWII and civil war, it did not make it lifeless. Cleaning and reconstruction effort will take some time, but Russia does have resources for that.
>Have you not watched /r/combatfootage recently?
Of course not. I can work with native sources in Ukrainian and Russian on both sides of the conflict that give me a full picture, not just drone videos.
> but they're forced to buy shells from North Korea!
Taken out of context this means nothing. Russia is currently producing 3 times more shells than entire NATO combined. They were much more efficient in increasing production than supposedly economically superior Western countries. They buy extra from North Korea due to the intensity of the conflict. The same can be said about many other types of equipment (drone production increasing even ahead of schedule).
> The Ruble is going to lose a lot of its value when the Russian government can no longer afford to artificially prop it up. People don't like being paid in turnips and promises.
Wrong assumption. There exists scarcity of the workforce in Russia, so salaries in non-government sector are rising too. As a matter of fact, the war reduced inequality for the first time in many years, thanks to visibly higher incomes of working class. For migrants, who send the money abroad this only means that they should not save in rubles and use less volatile currency. Yuan is already popular in Russia.
> Sure, maybe, but would you rather work in an air-conditioned robotics factory that looks like a clean-room and getting paid in hard currency or cutting lumber in Siberia and getting paid in Rubles?
Reality is not how you imagine it. First of all, many Siberian and Arctic jobs are paid better and are often taken by Russians. Most Central Asian immigrants go to European part of Russia and a few big cities in Asian part. It's mostly a hard work, for sure, but assumption that they will get anything better in Korea or anywhere else in South Asia is surely wrong. Nobody is going to hire a guy from Tajikistan who does not speak Korean and has no idea what to do on an air-conditioned robotics factory. He will be doing the same type of the job as in Russia but with less social security, no support from diaspora, much harder visa process etc. It's basically an ignorant fantasy that they might have gone to Korea. It does not work that way.
Russia's male military-age population is under 12 million, and maybe 800,000 have been killed or seriously injured so far. The solution Russia is trying: "Pregnant at 16", a reality TV show, to encourage young women to get pregnant.[1] They need fresh meat for the grinder.
[1] https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/11/10/russia-popul...
Shells from North Korea are just clickbait news taken out of context. Russia produces locally 3x times more shells for this war than the entire NATO.
Extending the war seems to be the current plan for Putin.
The West has been pretty wishy washy on blocking Russian oil sales. That could change.
Trump is just itching to have a tariff war and tariffs/sanctions on any country buying Russian oil, including India and China could cause problems for Russia with it being their main source of income and their being a bit on the edge financially already.
I think what Trump has done to Colombia is not reproducible at scale and he won't use the same approach against China or India for wrong reason (war in Ukraine is an unworthy problem in "America first" mindset).
Monroe doctrine may be still alive, but re-alignment is going to happen everywhere now and further sanctions will have less and less effect because of that most of all.
I do think that the West has lost this war in 2023, when Biden and northwest of Europe were sleeping and ignoring the signs. This happened not least because the West does not actually care about Ukraine, it's pure moral standing with zero strategic interest. I mean, Poland may believe that Ukraine is a good buffer and Baltics may believe that Ukraine is a good distraction, but what makes them safe is that they do enjoy Article 5 protection and Russia will not test that for wrong reason.
https://youtu.be/lNZ56C-f4a8?t=362
re "the West does not actually care about Ukraine", I think they care about the principle that you should be able to go about your business without getting invaded more than about Ukraine specifically. It's like if someone gets mugged in your town - you may not care that much about the specific victim but you care about the principle that the muggers don't get away with it.
Seems a bit unfair. Trump was clearly elected and not part of a long line of Bush/Clintons + friends. Also his main plan is to stop the fighting, perhaps by being economically aggressive but that's a step back from killing people.
All of the signs, and US & ally weaknesses that allow for a lead-up, were out in plain sight.
While I don’t agree with Trump’s methods (nor do I wish to see war), both the US and our allies have grown complacent.
Some in Europe believe we have economy of scale in terms of military and output, but this belief is many decades out of date.